Rails core - Feb 2007 - documentation missing on Rails site for ActiveSupport::CoreExtensions::Module

Hi

The documentation for ActiveSupport::CoreExtensions::Module doesn''t
seem to be showing up on the Rails API site (at least the site isn''t
showing aliasing.rb, and a few others -- haven''t checked all).
It''s
there on the Edge docs at caboo.se (as are a lot of other methods not
on the Rails official API), so I''m guessing there''s some sort
of
filter on the Rails one, poss to filter out methods that aren''t
considered to public usage. However, wouldn''t have though
alias_attribute etc were part of those.

Just thought you should know, in case it was an error.

Cheers
Chris


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Caboose edge docs do a gsub on #:nodoc which is there because someone
decided that method isn''t part of the public API (and therefore able
to be changed at will).

On 2/10/07, ctmailinglists@googlemail.com <ctmailinglists@googlemail.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> The documentation for ActiveSupport::CoreExtensions::Module
doesn''t
> seem to be showing up on the Rails API site (at least the site
isn''t
> showing aliasing.rb, and a few others -- haven''t checked all).
It''s
> there on the Edge docs at caboo.se (as are a lot of other methods not
> on the Rails official API), so I''m guessing there''s some
sort of
> filter on the Rails one, poss to filter out methods that aren''t
> considered to public usage. However, wouldn''t have though
> alias_attribute etc were part of those.
>
> Just thought you should know, in case it was an error.
>
> Cheers
> Chris
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Thought that might be the case, but would have expected these methods to 
be part of the public API -- they also don''t seem to have #:nodoc on 
them and do seem to have user-friendly documentation in the files.

Not a big problem -- just thought it might be a mistake.

Cheers
Chris

Courtenay wrote:
> Caboose edge docs do a gsub on #:nodoc which is there because someone
> decided that method isn''t part of the public API (and therefore
able
> to be changed at will).
>
> On 2/10/07, ctmailinglists@googlemail.com
<ctmailinglists@googlemail.com> wrote:
>   
>> Hi
>>
>> The documentation for ActiveSupport::CoreExtensions::Module
doesn''t
>> seem to be showing up on the Rails API site (at least the site
isn''t
>> showing aliasing.rb, and a few others -- haven''t checked all).
It''s
>> there on the Edge docs at caboo.se (as are a lot of other methods not
>> on the Rails official API), so I''m guessing there''s
some sort of
>> filter on the Rails one, poss to filter out methods that
aren''t
>> considered to public usage. However, wouldn''t have though
>> alias_attribute etc were part of those.
>>
>> Just thought you should know, in case it was an error.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>     
>
> >
>
>   

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

On Feb 10, 2007, at 7:10 PM, Chris T wrote:
> Thought that might be the case, but would have expected these  
> methods to
> be part of the public API -- they also don''t seem to have #:nodoc
on
> them and do seem to have user-friendly documentation in the files.
Alot of modules in AS are #nodoc''ed by default, so all the methods  
and all their submodules get flushed out of the docs as well
personally I think it is worthy to open more of the docs but it seems  
to be DHH''s decision
-- 
Julian ''Julik'' Tarkhanov
please send all personal mail to
me at julik.nl



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---