Hi nice guys! I''ve been using Rails for a couple of days. I''ve got to say that Rails do meet the buzzword expectations... Every part of Rails amazes me, especially Active Record. I come from the PHP world where there are vast choices of "DB abstraction layer" we can choose, from the "minimalist" PEAR DB, to PEAR MDB, and what I''d say the most advanced ones like Creole+Propel. Active Record definitely wins by several hands. I wonder how much time David (and Rails contributors) has spent on Active Record alone, let alone the entire Rails package. The Migration feature is very handy, the concept is simple yet it works. Some packages like PEAR MDB uses schema comparison approach, which is very complex (especially for MB developers) and also not very easy to use. Although MDB''s technique also automates it a bit (basically you define a target schema, and MDB will modify the current database to match the target, but I like Migration''s approach much better). Anyways, I''ve come across several problems. Maybe bugs, maybe not. In any case I was hoping if it can be enhanced even if not fixed, so not everyone will face these problems again. At the very least, giving a helpful error message would be really great. So, let''s get started... The first difficulty is getting the first Rails app to work. I''m using Ruby one-click Installer on Windows XP. The installer works great. Rails, though, not that smooth. I choose to download the "rails-x.x.x.tgz" since it claims to have the entire package (I do aware that Rails uses activerecord, etc. gems, but I don''t download it since the "entire package" supposedly has them). Note that I don''t have active Internet connection, I go to Internet cafe to download all the stuff I need then I go back home to try what I''ve downloaded. That means if I missed a needed part, I''ve to go back to Internet cafe again, and that''s not nice. Extracted rails-1.1.6.tgz. Trying... But, it turns out that "ruby script/server" fails: D:\rails>ruby script/server => Booting WEBrick... c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `gem_original_re quire'': ./script/../config/../config/environment.rb:8: parse error, unexpected '' <'' (SyntaxError) <%= ''# '' if freeze %>RAILS_GEM_VERSION = ''<%= Rails::VERSION::STRING %>'' ^ from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `re quire'' from ./script/../config/../vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support /dependencies.rb:147:in `require'' from ./script/../config/../vendor/rails/railties/lib/commands/servers/we brick.rb:52 from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `ge m_original_require'' from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `re quire'' from ./script/../config/../vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support /dependencies.rb:147:in `require'' from ./script/../config/../vendor/rails/railties/lib/commands/server.rb: 30 from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `ge m_original_require'' from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `re quire'' from script/server:3 Definitely not a very nice experience. After banging my head several times, I figured that I''ve to download the rails gem and all the gems it requires. Another roundtrip to Internet cafe. I can''t find a page on Rails download page that lists direct link URLs to all gems I need [BAD], maybe it''s somewhere but it should be very visible upfront to avoid frustrations. I also can''t find a Rails download that includes all the Rails gems and its supportive files in one .tgz or .zip file (BAD). I''m aware of InstantRails, but it seems more like a "distro" rather than a collection of needed support files, therefore I don''t download it. The "solution" is to install Ruby on the computer that''s connected to the Internet. Then I execute the recommended way of installing rails : gem install rails --include-dependencies Took some time. But it works. The problem is, you can''t just install Ruby on every computer you need to use to download Rails. Why not just pack a bunch of gems in one tgz/zip to make some people''s life easier? The problem was, how do I copy the required .gem-s to my computer? It turns out I have to mess with C:\ruby\lib\ruby folder to find the gems I need, copy those to my flashdisk and bring them home. OK, mission accomplished. [another annoyance, not directly related to Rails] The problem with installing .gems from localdisk is that gem doesn''t seem to autoinstall dependencies (not like online gem install from Internet). The way that some people actually think that most people in the world have 24-hour Internet connection at the luxury of their home computers definitely disgusts me (sorry). After manually installing all required gems, a call to rails to build a site, then ''ruby script/server'' works. Oh, at last. But why did I has to be so painful to get here? A side note: Installing Apache + PHP on Windows is also not that easy (it''s much harder than installing Ruby/Rails, IMHO, requires you to edit some files like httpd.conf, php.ini, PATH env, etc.). At the very least, it doesn''t require active Internet connection and having to install some program (like Ruby + rubygem) just to download something. All I need would be the Apache binary package, the PHP zip package, and the PHP manual which contains everything you need to know to install, configure, develop (it includes User Guide as well as Reference), even to create PHP extensions using C! (the enhanced CHM version even comes with user comments, definitely a plus). Sorry for the complaints, but it''d be great if we could have more ways to make Rails better and easier to use. -- Hendy Irawan Web: gauldong.net Mobile: +62 856 24889899 Yahoo Messenger: ceefour666 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 9/24/06, Hendy Irawan <gauldong@gmail.com> wrote:> > Sorry for the complaints, but it''d be great if we could have more ways > to make Rails better and easier to use.Thanks for your feedback Hendy - this is actually a bug report :-) The Rails 1.1.6 tarball includes the environment.rb template instead of a ''real'' generated file. If this problem is fixed, the tarball install should work fine for you. Sorry for the frustration (and extra trips to the internet cafe!) jeremy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> The way that some people actually think that most people in the world > have 24-hour Internet connection at the luxury of their home computers > definitely disgusts me (sorry).Of course, not everybody has that luxury. But I don''t think its unfair to assume that a web developer would have some kind of home internet connection. I''m not sure how you could possibly work efficiently and easily without one. Cheers Luke Redpath --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> > The way that some people actually think that most people in the world > > have 24-hour Internet connection at the luxury of their home computers > > definitely disgusts me (sorry). > > Of course, not everybody has that luxury. But I don''t think its > unfair to assume that a web developer would have some kind of home > internet connection. I''m not sure how you could possibly work > efficiently and easily without one.I agree on "efficiently and easily". It''s definitely not efficient and not easy. Although I''d say it''s more efficient cost-wise (now don''t say that Internet connection is cheap, no part of the world is the same). However I can''t disagree more on the "possibly" clause. It''s definitely possible. Once you have your development environment set up, there are LOTS of things you can do offline. (and lots more when online). Developing an entire CMS is possible offline. Of course, if you want to do some online stuff, like RSS aggregating or integration with Flickr''s API, you need to be online to test it with the real world. Otherwise, most of the stuff web developers do is possible to be done without the Internet. There are server software that can be installed for development purposes, and some frameworks even include tests, mocks, and fixtures, to help offline development. Although (maybe) some people prefer to work with the real database server using the ''production'' environment setting while debugging their apps, it''s their choice. This is not saying that I don''t like online development (or more accurately, development while being connected to the Internet, regardless whether the Internet is in use or not). But just to say that I don''t like using/installing/developing something that "mandates" Internet connection just to install it in the first place (not to deploy it, which is obviously necessary). Rails is not such an app, but it looks like such an app and I definitely think so because I had to install Ruby first then run ''gem install rails'' on a computer that''s not even my development computer! All I ask would be just some clearness in the download page, come on it may be hard to give these three options: 1. download a (currently) broken rails-x.x.x.tgz package and you''re set! 2. gem install rails (which requires Ruby + gem installed on the downloading computer) 3. download a .tgz/.zip containing rails-x-x-x.gem and all required gems (or, alternatively, just give direct links to each of the required gems so I can just select these and click "FlashGot selection") 4. (optional, but really helpful + I recommend highly) download a .zip file containing the Rails API, Rails HOWTO, Rails WIKI, Rails docs and whatever you want to put there so it makes the world more like heaven for unlucky people like me. (some may want to say just "gem rdoc --all" or "rails doc:rails" but this doesn''t work in my case, but this will be my "bug" report in the next series, coming soon in theaters in your city) But... The 3rd option will make life easier for poor people like me. The 4th option will make life even easier for people like me and for some others, too. Even if I have 24/7 Internet connection, why would I connect to the Internet when I can browse all docs offline, and I can search blindingly fast after installing something like Google Desktop? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Jeremy Kemper wrote:> On 9/24/06, Hendy Irawan <gauldong@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Sorry for the complaints, but it''d be great if we could have more ways > > to make Rails better and easier to use. > > Thanks for your feedback Hendy - this is actually a bug report :-) The > Rails 1.1.6 tarball includes the environment.rb template instead of a ''real'' > generated file. If this problem is fixed, the tarball install should work > fine for you. Sorry for the frustration (and extra trips to the internet > cafe!)Thanks Mr. Kemper... Anyways, it''d be greater if we can have a tarball of all needed gems instead of a "rails working directory". I think it''d be more useful. If it''s already there somewhere it''d be great if it can be listed in the rubyonrails download page. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Michael Koziarski
2006-Sep-25 22:14 UTC
Re: [BUG?] Rails installation -- first in a series
> Thanks Mr. Kemper... > > Anyways, it''d be greater if we can have a tarball of all needed gems > instead of a "rails working directory". I think it''d be more useful. If > it''s already there somewhere it''d be great if it can be listed in the > rubyonrails download page.Isn''t this what instant rails or locomotive try to solve? One download which includes everything you need to get up and running with rails? -- Cheers Koz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---