-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey all, Could the PostgreSQL users in the crowd lend a hand testing http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/2594 on svn trunk against PG 7.4, 8.0, 8.1? We need some more eyeballs in the stew. Thanks! jeremy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDdm1oAQHALep9HFYRAjhCAJ4k49808L/K64DX2A2cs8pqeH/SdQCgiab3 qmC5hymK0CwP9te/41RuFQg=rezh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 12, 2005, at 2:32 PM, Jeremy Kemper wrote:> Could the PostgreSQL users in the crowd lend a hand testing > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/2594 > on svn trunk against PG 7.4, 8.0, 8.1?And by ''testing'' I mean do ''rake test_postgresql'' against a svn checkout. There should be a single (known) test failure on test_preconfigured_includes_with_has_many, but no others. jeremy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDdm4HAQHALep9HFYRAhWtAKC2nkQ+N16nKuzWy7zazzsIVpelOQCdGlef 6xoiPpeGtkUbCP0cJmsdojI=itZK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 14:34 -0800, Jeremy Kemper wrote:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Nov 12, 2005, at 2:32 PM, Jeremy Kemper wrote: > > Could the PostgreSQL users in the crowd lend a hand testing > > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/2594 > > on svn trunk against PG 7.4, 8.0, 8.1? > > And by ''testing'' I mean do ''rake test_postgresql'' against a svn > checkout. > > There should be a single (known) test failure on > test_preconfigured_includes_with_has_many, but no others. > > jeremyI''ll give it a whirl later. I have each of those PostgreSQL versions running on my workstation. Do you mean the patch that you refer to in the comments? -Robby -- /****************************************************** * Robby Russell, Owner.Developer.Geek * PLANET ARGON, Open Source Solutions & Web Hosting * Portland, Oregon | p: 503.351.4730 | f: 815.642.4068 * www.planetargon.com | www.robbyonrails.com * Programming Rails | www.programmingrails.com *******************************************************/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 12, 2005, at 3:07 PM, Robby Russell wrote:> On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 14:34 -0800, Jeremy Kemper wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On Nov 12, 2005, at 2:32 PM, Jeremy Kemper wrote: >>> Could the PostgreSQL users in the crowd lend a hand testing >>> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/2594 >>> on svn trunk against PG 7.4, 8.0, 8.1? >> >> And by ''testing'' I mean do ''rake test_postgresql'' against a svn >> checkout. >> >> There should be a single (known) test failure on >> test_preconfigured_includes_with_has_many, but no others. >> >> jeremy > > I''ll give it a whirl later. I have each of those PostgreSQL versions > running on my workstation. Do you mean the patch that you refer to in > the comments?Great! Just test against svn trunk -- we''re trying to see whether changeset 2985 fixes sequence discovery. All tests pass for me on 8.1 but not for Blair on 8.1. Fishy. If you''re up to it, do try to poke holes in the queries used in pk_and_sequence_for(table) as well. It tries the common case first (check for a SERIAL column by looking for evidence of it in pg_depend) and falls back the secondary case (check for custom sequence in DEFAULT nextval(...)). Thanks, jeremy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDdo35AQHALep9HFYRAj6ZAJ9ZFUnc4if1ORE2sr9UwhE9wpvHPACfUiEF LsOq2xrFeJGZ1yZtiE1YAb4=DPtr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----