Hey guys, As we move closer to 1.0, what are peoples thoughts on the following: 1) Make the rails CIA server generate gems with every commit 2) Every night, take the latest gem and make it ''beta'' We''re meant to be stabilising and polishing at present, so I wouldn''t expect any major breakages? -- Cheers Koz
On Jun 7, 2005, at 4:23 PM, Michael Koziarski wrote:> As we move closer to 1.0, what are peoples thoughts on the following: > > 1) Make the rails CIA server generate gems with every commit > 2) Every night, take the latest gem and make it ''beta'' > > We''re meant to be stabilising and polishing at present, so I wouldn''t > expect any major breakages?Alpha gems. I like it. Too bad you can''t tell gem that you want alpha/beta/stable: it''ll always grab the latest version, so we''d need a separate gem server. Messy. jeremy
Jeremy Kemper wrote:> Alpha gems. I like it. Too bad you can''t tell gem that you want > alpha/beta/stable: it''ll always grab the latest version, so we''d need > a separate gem server. Messy.Could name the alpha packages rails-alpha, activerecord-alpha, etc
On 6/8/05, Nicholas Seckar <nseckar@gmail.com> wrote:> Jeremy Kemper wrote: > > > Alpha gems. I like it. Too bad you can''t tell gem that you want > > alpha/beta/stable: it''ll always grab the latest version, so we''d need > > a separate gem server. Messy. > > Could name the alpha packages rails-alpha, activerecord-alpha, etconly if gem gets fixed, rails* being the default and all. A seperate gem server isn''t too bad really, I''d love to see more people running on edge rails, but until we make this easy ....> _______________________________________________ > Rails-core mailing list > Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core >-- Cheers Koz