On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 16:08, Tom Callaway <spotrh at gmail.com>
wrote:>
> because it is already one of those days and i didn't hit reply all. :/
>
> ~spot
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Tom Callaway <spotrh at gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [R-sig-Fedora] new packages needed
> To: I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org>
>
>
> shiny (not covr, that was my brain spitting out the wrong thing) imports it
> though.
Ah, true, Shiny 1.6 switched to bslib. Is this version of Shiny
required for the current rebuild then? I'm reluctant to take more R
packages in the official repos because the +17k I maintain in Copr
give me enough headaches. But I'd be happy to help review them too.
I?aki
> ~spot
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 9:54 AM I?aki Ucar <iucar at
fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 15:48, Tom Callaway <spotrh at gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi friends,
> > >
> > > As the 4.1.0 rebuild progresses, I've identified one set of
new
> > > dependencies that several packages (DT, covr) need in order to
upgrade:
> > >
> > > bslib
> > > \sass
> > > \jquerylib
> >
> > DT just suggests bslib, so it shouldn't be required. I looked at
the
> > code and bslib functions are not called if this package is not
> > present.
> >
> > I?aki
> >
> > > If someone here wanted to package them and get them into Fedora,
it would
> > > be helpful. I'd be happy to do the review, but I'm
reluctant to own more
> > > packages right now. :)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > ~spot
> > >
> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list
> > > R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org
> > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > I?aki ?car
> >
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list
> R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
--
I?aki ?car