This seems like a good opportunity to give this a go:
https://github.com/juhp/fbrnch#parallel-building
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 21:59, Tom Callaway <spotrh at gmail.com> wrote:
> That is a very good point. Oh well. Anyone want to help generate the build
> order? :)
>
> ~spot
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, 3:57 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade <
> quantum.analyst at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri., Jun. 4, 2021, 10:08 a.m. Tom Callaway, <spotrh at
gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a way to know which R components provide graphics drivers?
I
>>> would
>>> really rather not rebuild everything if we do not have to.
>>>
>>>
>> Unless you mean rebuild for testing purposes, because you added the
>> R(ABI) = major.minor Provides/Requires, you need to rebuild the world
>> anyway.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ~spot
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 6:28 AM I?aki Ucar <iucar at
fedoraproject.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 22:18, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at
fc.up.pt>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Hi all,
>>> > > what should be our plan for R 4.1 update in Fedora?
>>> >
>>> > See [1]. The plan is to wait for the next RStudio release and
>>> > coordinate updates.
>>> >
>>> > [1]
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-fedora/2021-May/000736.html
>>> >
>>> > > What are the pitfalls and the changes that we should be
aware?
>>> >
>>> > The NEWS says: "The graphics engine version,
R_GE_version, has been
>>> > bumped to 14 and so packages that provide graphics devices
should be
>>> > reinstalled." But anyway, we should do the customary mass
rebuild of
>>> > packages to avoid other possible incompatibilities and
"Package was
>>> > built under version 4.0" messages.
>>> >
>>> > I?aki
>>> >
>>> > > The second semester (with the corresponding induced
pandemic
>>> chaos) is
>>> > > dimming down around here so I have at least time to
breath again. :-)
>>> > >
>>> > > FWIW I am in no hurry to have 4.1 in Fedora 34, my main
interest
>>> is to
>>> > have
>>> > > it in rawhide and later if we find it suitable to
backport it to F34.
>>> > >
>>> > > FWIW since our last talk Octave (for version 7 at
least) is
>>> starting by
>>> > > default to have the major version in the path for
packages. :-)
>>> > >
>>> > > Best regards,
>>> > > --
>>> > > Jos? Ab?lio
>>> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>> > >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list
>>> > > R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org
>>> > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > I?aki ?car
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list
>>> > R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org
>>> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
>>> >
>>>
>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list
>>> R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
>>>
>>
--
I?aki ?car
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]