The first article had no code and did not describe a formula that I could find
which matched your code. The second article is behind a paywall.
?
David.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 3, 2022, at 3:39 PM, Bogdan Tanasa <tanasa at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> ?
> Dear Aaron, David, and everyone,
>
> Thank you again for your comments on my question related to the confidence
intervals. I am sorry for the late reply.
>
> The definition of the 95 confidence intervals where our discussion
originates from has been proposed by the authors of these two articles (I am
including the links to the articles just to show that the formula has been
published in a methods article a while ago; the articles are in the field of
biology though, where not too many of you are part of, I guess). These authors
have written the scripts and they have made those available on github. I have
asked a while ago the authors why they have chosen this formula, however, I have
not received any reply. In any case, at this moment I will use the mathematical
formulas described in the articles :
>
> https://www.cell.com/molecular-cell/fulltext/S1097-2765(15)00304-4
>
> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41596-019-0218-7
>
> Wishing everyone a good weekend,
>
> Bogdan
>
>
>
>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 6:53 PM Ebert,Timothy Aaron <tebert at
ufl.edu> wrote:
>> I have a general dislike of "analysis emergencies." I would
like to see a data emergency wherein someone must cram 3 years of data
collection into 18 months so that they have time to work out the correct
analysis. I am sure others would suggest working out how analyze the data before
starting the experiment.
>>
>> Our business office gives this advice to faculty members: An emergency
on your part is not an emergency on our part.
>>
>> How about starting by answering the questions posted by the people you
are hoping will help. Focus on David's middle paragraph. However, if you can
re-code everything to work, then it would seem that you already know the answer
and it might be simpler/faster to write the correct code.
>>
>> You might spend some time looking for a scientific paper that uses that
equation for the confidence interval and thereby get some context to explain why
the equation is correct.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: R-help <r-help-bounces at r-project.org> On Behalf Of
Bogdan Tanasa
>> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2022 8:55 PM
>> To: David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net>
>> Cc: r-help <r-help at r-project.org>
>> Subject: Re: [R] confidence intervals
>>
>> [External Email]
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Thank you for your comments, and feed-back message. I am very happy to
learn from the experience of the people on R mailing list, and without any
doubt, I am very thankful to you and to everyone for sharing their knowledge. I
do apologize for any confusion that I have created unwillingly with my previous
email.
>>
>> About my previous email related to the confidence intervals: indeed I
have posted the question with a detailed description on stackoverflow, and the
link is listed below.
>>
>> I have to admit that I have been in rush willing to have the
suggestions of R-help members by Monday (if that would have been possible), as I
have to make a decision at the beginning of this week on whether I need to
re-code the shell script in R. I have a deadline on Wed. The script itself is
less important per se, I have included it just to point our the origin of my
question.
>>
>> I do certainly respect the principles of online R-help community, and I
would very much appreciate if I could have your advice on the following :
>> shall a "R code related emergency" arise, would it be
acceptable to post the question on stackoverflow with the corresponding data
tables and detailed code, and to refer the posting on R-help mailing list ?
>>
>> If it is acceptable at least for a single email, and if you do not
mind, I could mention the link to stackoverflow, inviting our members to read
it, shall they be comfortable with this topic.
>>
>>
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F73507697%2Fconfidence-intervals-of-a-biological-assay%3Fnoredirect%3D1%23comment129816241_73507697&data=05%7C01%7Ctebert%40ufl.edu%7C0ba5d535471b46c05ec508da89592c20%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a62331e1b84%7C0%7C0%7C637973313343894313%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8sF7j4OCgH12qx4d8NCiw1%2FDbPa6nrui27S9C3ZNuL0%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> Thanks a lot, have a good week !
>>
>> ~ Bogdan
>>
>>
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F73507697%2Fconfidence-intervals-of-a-biological-assay%3Fnoredirect%3D1%23comment129816241_73507697&data=05%7C01%7Ctebert%40ufl.edu%7C0ba5d535471b46c05ec508da89592c20%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a62331e1b84%7C0%7C0%7C637973313343894313%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8sF7j4OCgH12qx4d8NCiw1%2FDbPa6nrui27S9C3ZNuL0%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022, 6:52 PM David Winsemius <dwinsemius at
comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > You cross-posted this to StackOverflow and did not say so. ...
and
>> > you posted in HTML Bad dog squared. I cast one of the close votes
on
>> > SO, but here I can only say ... READ the Posting Guide.
>> >
>> > You also give no citation other than someone's Github files
with
>> > minimal comments in that material. You should indicate whether
this
>> > code has any solid support. Why do you think this code is
something to depend upon?
>> >
>> > After all, you been posting questions on R-help for several
months.
>> > Don't you think you should make a good faith effort to
understand the
>> > principles underlying this resource?
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > David.
>> >
>> > On 8/26/22 17:55, Bogdan Tanasa wrote:
>> > > Dear all,
>> > >
>> > > Although I know that it is not a statistics mailing list,
given my
>> > > work
>> > on
>> > > ICeChIP
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith
>> >
ub.com%2Fshah-rohan%2Ficechip%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2FScripts%2FcomputeHMDan
>> >
dError&data=05%7C01%7Ctebert%40ufl.edu%7C0ba5d535471b46c05ec508da8
>> >
9592c20%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a62331e1b84%7C0%7C0%7C63797331334389431
>> >
3%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6
>> >
Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9HOH72K0Lj30w7tE%2BMN
>> > oXakPbO1sasaujUTsnHFwDZo%3D&reserved=0
>> > >
>> > > I would appreciate to have the answer to a question :
>> > >
>> > > given two variables a and b (a and b can have 1000
paired-values)
>> > > and a calibration number "cal",
>> > >
>> > > why the 95 confidence interval has been calculated as such
for each
>> > > value
>> > > a(i) and b(i) :
>> > >
>> > > 100 / cal * sqrt (( a/ (b^2) + (a^2) / (b ^3)) * 1.96
>> > >
>> > > Thank you,
>> > >
>> > > Bogdan
>> > >
>> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>> > >
>> > > ______________________________________________
>> > > R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and
more, see
>> > >
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fst
>> > >
at.ethz.ch%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fr-help&data=05%7C01%7Ctebert%4
>> > >
0ufl.edu%7C0ba5d535471b46c05ec508da89592c20%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a
>> > >
62331e1b84%7C0%7C0%7C637973313344050547%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJW
>> > >
IjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C300
>> > >
0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=KfmZ6PvxUVrbCMzVZcz6S2H2sqfWQmw2WIZHERwKDEk%3D&
>> > > amp;reserved=0
>> > > PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> >
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.r
>> >
-project.org%2Fposting-guide.html&data=05%7C01%7Ctebert%40ufl.edu%
>> >
7C0ba5d535471b46c05ec508da89592c20%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a62331e1b84%
>> >
7C0%7C0%7C637973313344050547%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwM
>> >
DAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&
>> >
sdata=127HvzZh7q9Xa7LaESHIEXIy3CdmUyQ3cxAVeOA%2Bukg%3D&reserved=0
>> > > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible
code.
>> >
>>
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>>
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstat.ethz.ch%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fr-help&data=05%7C01%7Ctebert%40ufl.edu%7C0ba5d535471b46c05ec508da89592c20%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a62331e1b84%7C0%7C0%7C637973313344050547%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=KfmZ6PvxUVrbCMzVZcz6S2H2sqfWQmw2WIZHERwKDEk%3D&reserved=0
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.r-project.org%2Fposting-guide.html&data=05%7C01%7Ctebert%40ufl.edu%7C0ba5d535471b46c05ec508da89592c20%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a62331e1b84%7C0%7C0%7C637973313344050547%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=127HvzZh7q9Xa7LaESHIEXIy3CdmUyQ3cxAVeOA%2Bukg%3D&reserved=0
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]