Unlikely
See here:
https://www.r-bloggers.com/2017/08/how-to-make-best-use-of-the-byte-compiler-in-r/
Byte code compilation should be automatic in both cases, as I understand
it. Of course, I could be wrong due to special features of parallel
programming, etc.
A reprex might be helpful here.
Cheers,
Bert
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022, 7:29 PM akshay kulkarni <akshay_e4 at hotmail.com>
wrote:
> Dear members,
> I am using pbmclapply, the progress bar version
> of mclapply, from the parallel package. The point is, pbmclapply is three
> times faster than mclapply, and I think the most probable reason would be
> that pbmclapply is byte code compiled (I can think of no other reason).
>
> I know the cmpfun function from compiler package. If I do:
>
> > cmpfun(mclapply)
>
> will the job be done? The point is mclapply may look for other functions
> in the parallel package. So I have to compile the whole package right? How
> do you do that? or in general, how do you byte code compile a whole
package?
>
> Thanking you,
> Yours sincerely,
> AKSHAY M KULKARNI
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]