Hello,
Inline.
?s 22:08 de 03/12/21, Rich Shepard escreveu:> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021, Rich Shepard wrote:
>
>> I find solutions when the data_frame is grouped, but none when it's
not.
>
> Thanks, Bert. ?which.max confirmed that's all I need to find the
maximum
> value.
>
> Now I need to read more than ?filter to learn why I'm not getting the
> relevant row with:
>> which.max(pdx_disc$cfs)
> [1] 8054
This is the *index* for which cfs is the first maximum, not the maximum
value itself.
>
>> filter(pdx_disc, cfs == 8054)
Therefore, you probably want any of
filter(pdx_disc, cfs == cfs[8054])
filter(pdx_disc, cfs == cfs[which.max(cfs)])
filter(pdx_disc, cfs == max(cfs)) # I find this one better, simpler
Hope this helps,
Rui Barradas
> # A tibble: 0 ? 9
> # ? with 9 variables: site_nbr <chr>, year <int>, mon
<int>, day <int>,
> #?? hr <dbl>, min <dbl>, tz <chr>, cfs <dbl>,
sampdt <dttm>
>
> Regards,
>
> Rich
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.