By not posting a reproducible example, you're wasting everyone's time.
Duncan Murdoch
On 30/11/2020 6:06 a.m., Steven Yen wrote:> No, sorry. Line 1 below did not print for me and I had to go around and
> do line 2 to print:
>
> me.probit(obj)
>
> v<-me.probit(obj); v
>
> A puzzle.
>
>
> On 2020/11/30 ?? 07:00, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> On 30/11/2020 5:41 a.m., Stefan Evert wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 30 Nov 2020, at 10:41, Steven Yen <styen at
ntu.edu.tw> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks. I know, my point was on why I get something printed by
>>>> simply doing line 1 below and at other occasions had to do line
2.
>>>>
>>>> me.probit(obj)
>>>
>>> That means the return value of me.probit() has been marked as
>>> invisible, so it won't auto-print.? You have to use an explicit
print
>>>
>>> ????print(me.probit(obj))
>>>
>>> or use your work-around to convince R that you actually meant to
>>> print the output.
>>>
>>> If you dig through the full code of me.probit(), you'll
probably find
>>> the function invisible() called somewhere.
>>>
>>
>> I think you misread his post.? "me.probit(obj)" on its own
*did*
>> print. ?It was when he assigned it to a variable using "v <-
>> me.probit(obj)" that it didn't.? Assignments are almost always
>> invisible in R.
>>
>> The other thing that people sometimes find confusing is that
>> evaluating expressions that are visible are the top level doesn't
make
>> them print when they are nested in a block of code.? Usually this
>> happens in a function, e.g. typing a number normally makes it visible,
>> but
>>
>> f <- function() {
>> ? 1
>> ? 2
>> }
>> f()
>>
>> doesn't print 1, it only prints 2, and that happens because 2 is
the
>> return value of the function.
>>
>> Duncan Murdoch