Dear Jim,
As I pointed out yesterday, setting ylim as you suggest still results in
"0e+00" as the smallest tick mark, as it should for evenly spaced
ticks.
Best,
John
> On Jul 10, 2020, at 12:13 AM, Jim Lemon <drjimlemon at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi Luigi,
> This is a result of the "pretty" function that calculates
hopefully
> good looking axis ticks automatically. You can always specify
> ylim=c(1.0E09,max(Y)) if you want.
>
> Jim
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 10:59 PM Luigi Marongiu <marongiu.luigi at
gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> I have these vectors:
>> ```
>> X <- 1:7
>> Y <- c(1438443863, 3910100650, 10628760108, 28891979048,
78536576706,
>> 213484643920, 580311678200)
>> plot(Y~X)
>> ```
>> The y-axis starts at 0e0, but the first value is 1.4 billion. Why the
>> axis does not start at 1e9?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Luigi
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.