Dear Bert, On 2020-06-19 18:33 -0700, Bert Gunter wrote:> All of your torrent of requests for help to > have others do your work for you are about > genomics issues.I am a bioinformatician, I am supposed should know all of these things, GWAS, Le ggplot, etc. ...> Why aren't you posting on the Bioconductor > Help forum instead, where both the > expertise and tools for such matters exist? > I would characterize your posts here as > being largely inappropriate for that > reason.Perhaps r-sig-genetics@ or r-sig-phylo@? It needs some more volume ... Best, Rasmus -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20200620/524fc186/attachment.sig>
genetics is not genomics. Nor are phylogenies. I still believe Bioc is the right resource. Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:17 PM Rasmus Liland <jral at posteo.no> wrote:> Dear Bert, > > On 2020-06-19 18:33 -0700, Bert Gunter wrote: > > All of your torrent of requests for help to > > have others do your work for you are about > > genomics issues. > > I am a bioinformatician, I am supposed should > know all of these things, GWAS, Le ggplot, > etc. ... > > > Why aren't you posting on the Bioconductor > > Help forum instead, where both the > > expertise and tools for such matters exist? > > I would characterize your posts here as > > being largely inappropriate for that > > reason. > > Perhaps r-sig-genetics@ or r-sig-phylo@? It > needs some more volume ... > > Best, > Rasmus >[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
On 2020-06-20 07:29 -0700, Bert Gunter wrote:> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:17 PM Rasmus Liland wrote: > > On 2020-06-19 18:33 -0700, Bert Gunter wrote: > > > Why aren't you posting on the > > > Bioconductor Help forum instead > > > > Perhaps r-sig-genetics@ or r-sig-phylo@? > > genetics is not genomics. Nor are > phylogenies. I still believe Bioc is the > right resource.Right, I had a hunch all these fields were kind of related somehow ?\_(?)_/? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20200620/2ba18ecc/attachment.sig>