Bert Gunter
2020-Feb-04 22:45 UTC
[R] doing 1000 permutations and doing test statistics distribution
Yes, a clear thinko... Thanks for the correction. -- Bert On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 1:41 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:> On 04/02/2020 4:28 p.m., Ana Marija wrote: > > I tired your code on this simplified data just for say 10 permutations: > > > > dat <- read.table(text = " code.1 code.2 code.3 code.4 > > 1 82 93 NA NA > > 2 15 85 93 NA > > 3 93 89 NA NA > > 4 81 NA NA NA", > > header = TRUE, stringsAsFactors = FALSE) > > > > dat2=data.matrix(dat) > > > >> result<- lapply(seq_len(10), FUN = function(dat2){ > > + dat2 <- dat2[, sample.int(4)] > > + print(colnames(dat2)) > > + } ) > > Error in dat2[, sample.int(4)] : incorrect number of dimensions > > Yes, Bert did suggest that, but it's obviously wrong. The argument to > FUN is an element of seq_len(10), it's not the full dataset. Try > > result<- lapply(seq_len(10), FUN = function(i){ > dat <- dat2[, sample.int(4)] > print(colnames(dat)) > } ) > > Duncan Murdoch > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 3:10 PM Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> I am not going to do your programming for you. If the following doesn't > suffice, maybe someone else will provide you something that will. > >> > >> m = your matrix > >> > >> code = your code that uses m > >> > >> your list of results <- lapply(seq_len(1000), FUN = function(m){ > >> m <- m[, sample.int(132)] > >> code > >> } ) > >> > >> or use an explicit for() loop to populate a list or vector with your > results. > >> > >> Again, if I have misunderstood what you want to do, then clarify, and > perhaps someone else will help. > >> > >> -- Bert > >> > >> > >> > >> Bert Gunter > >> > >> "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along > and sticking things into it." > >> -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 12:41 PM Ana Marija <sokovic.anamarija at gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Bert, > >>> > >>> thanks for getting back to me. I have to permute those 132 columns > >>> 1000 times and perform the code given in the previous email. > >>> > >>> Can you please show me how you would do that in the loop? This is also > >>> a huge data set ... > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> Ana > >>> > >>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 2:34 PM Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> If you just want to permute columns of a matrix, > >>>> > >>>> ?sample > >>>>> sample.int(10) > >>>> [1] 9 2 10 8 4 6 3 1 5 7 > >>>> > >>>> and you can just use this as an index into the columns of your > matrix, presumably within a loop of some sort. > >>>> > >>>> If I have misunderstood, just ignore. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Bert > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 12:23 PM Ana Marija < > sokovic.anamarija at gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hello, > >>>>> > >>>>> I have a matrix > >>>>>> dim(dat) > >>>>> [1] 15568 132 > >>>>> > >>>>> It looks like this: > >>>>> > >>>>> NoD_14381_norm.1 NoD_14381_norm.2 > NoD_14381_norm.3 > >>>>> NoD_14520_30mM.1 NoD_14520_30mM.2 NoD_14520_30mM.3 > >>>>> Ku8QhfS0n_hIOABXuE 4.75 4.25 4.79 > >>>>> 4.33 4.63 3.85 > >>>>> Bx496XsFXiAlj.Eaeo 6.15 6.23 6.55 > >>>>> 6.26 6.24 5.99 > >>>>> W38p0ogk.wIBVRXllY 7.13 7.35 7.55 > >>>>> 7.37 7.36 7.55 > >>>>> QIBkqIS9LR5DfTlTS8 6.27 6.73 6.45 > >>>>> 5.39 4.75 4.96 > >>>>> BZKiEvS0eQ305U0v34 6.35 7.02 6.76 > >>>>> 5.45 5.25 5.02 > >>>>> 6TheVd.HiE1UF3lX6g 5.53 5.02 5.36 > >>>>> 5.61 5.66 5.37 > >>>>> > >>>>> So it is a matrix with gene names ex. Ku8QhfS0n_hIOABXuE, and > subjects > >>>>> named ex. NoD_14381_norm.1 > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> How to do 1000 permutations of these 132 columns and on each created > >>>>> new permuted matrix perform this code: > >>>>> > >>>>> subject="all_replicate" > >>>>> > targets<-readTargets(paste(PhenotypeDir,"hg_sg_",subject,"_target.txt", > sep='')) > >>>>> Treat <- factor(targets$Treatment,levels=c("C","T")) > >>>>> Replicates <- factor(targets$rep) > >>>>> design <- model.matrix(~Replicates+Treat) > >>>>> corfit <- duplicateCorrelation(dat, block = targets$Subject) > >>>>> corfit$consensus.correlation > >>>>> fit > <-lmFit(dat,design,block=targets$Subject,correlation=corfit$consensus.correlation) > >>>>> fit<-eBayes(fit) > >>>>> qval.cutoff=0.1; FC.cutoff=0.17 > >>>>> y1=topTable(fit, coef="TreatT", > n=nrow(genes),adjust.method="BH",genelist=genes) > >>>>> > >>>>> y1 for each iteration of permutation would have P.Value column and > >>>>> these I would have plotted on the end to find the distribution of all > >>>>> p values generated in those 1000 permutations. > >>>>> > >>>>> Please advise, > >>>>> Ana > >>>>> > >>>>> ______________________________________________ > >>>>> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > >>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > >>>>> PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > >>>>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > > > > ______________________________________________ > > R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > > > >[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Ana Marija
2020-Feb-05 15:15 UTC
[R] doing 1000 permutations and doing test statistics distribution
I tried to solve the task via following code: manyorders <- replicate(100, sample(colnames(dat)), simplify=FALSE) all_results <- lapply(manyorders, function(ord) { tmpdat <- `colnames<-`(dat, ord) # copies and renames in one line corfit <- duplicateCorrelation(dat, block = targets$Subject) corfit$consensus.correlation fit <-lmFit(dat,design,block=targets$Subject,correlation=corfit$consensus.correlation) fit <- eBayes(fit) y1 <- topTable(fit, coef="TreatT", n=nrow(genes), adjust.method="BH", genelist=genes) list(fit = fit, y1 = y1) }) and I wrote all_results in a file write.table(all_results, file="all_res", sep = " ", row.names = FALSE, col.names = TRUE,quote=FALSE) when I tried to open the file:> a=read.table("all_res", header=T)Error in read.table("all_res", header = T) : more columns than column names also with fread:> a=fread("all_res")Warning messages: 1: In fread("all_res") : Detected 35300 column names but the data has 35700 columns (i.e. invalid file). Added 400 extra default column names at the end. 2: In fread("all_res") : Stopped early on line 5. Expected 35700 fields but found 35400. Consider fill=TRUE and comment.char=. First discarded non-empty line: <<5.73583235032546 0.182418204566858 0.178323702841331 -1.69234503648485 -1.83571739423166 -1.72136694103431 1.35210840970636 1.37698365727967 1.65643614366521 1.33750809366081 1.22116614774455 1.07000318265432 -1.13789084968265 -1.0757049956716 -1.24824627469937 -0.208441151406013 -0.246971068064524 -0.272463550264579 -0.561691522816148 -0.407713100376217 -0.538071283637418 -0.979274581542649 -0.909855772342568 -0.974827213844384 0.21700425934175 0.134586251989901 0.0818947419096577 -0.6788584605>> my original dat matrix has 132 columns and around 15000 rows Can you please advise on this? Thanks Ana On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 4:45 PM Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote:> > Yes, a clear thinko... Thanks for the correction. > > -- Bert > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 1:41 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 04/02/2020 4:28 p.m., Ana Marija wrote: >> > I tired your code on this simplified data just for say 10 permutations: >> > >> > dat <- read.table(text = " code.1 code.2 code.3 code.4 >> > 1 82 93 NA NA >> > 2 15 85 93 NA >> > 3 93 89 NA NA >> > 4 81 NA NA NA", >> > header = TRUE, stringsAsFactors = FALSE) >> > >> > dat2=data.matrix(dat) >> > >> >> result<- lapply(seq_len(10), FUN = function(dat2){ >> > + dat2 <- dat2[, sample.int(4)] >> > + print(colnames(dat2)) >> > + } ) >> > Error in dat2[, sample.int(4)] : incorrect number of dimensions >> >> Yes, Bert did suggest that, but it's obviously wrong. The argument to >> FUN is an element of seq_len(10), it's not the full dataset. Try >> >> result<- lapply(seq_len(10), FUN = function(i){ >> dat <- dat2[, sample.int(4)] >> print(colnames(dat)) >> } ) >> >> Duncan Murdoch >> >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 3:10 PM Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> I am not going to do your programming for you. If the following doesn't suffice, maybe someone else will provide you something that will. >> >> >> >> m = your matrix >> >> >> >> code = your code that uses m >> >> >> >> your list of results <- lapply(seq_len(1000), FUN = function(m){ >> >> m <- m[, sample.int(132)] >> >> code >> >> } ) >> >> >> >> or use an explicit for() loop to populate a list or vector with your results. >> >> >> >> Again, if I have misunderstood what you want to do, then clarify, and perhaps someone else will help. >> >> >> >> -- Bert >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Bert Gunter >> >> >> >> "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." >> >> -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 12:41 PM Ana Marija <sokovic.anamarija at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hi Bert, >> >>> >> >>> thanks for getting back to me. I have to permute those 132 columns >> >>> 1000 times and perform the code given in the previous email. >> >>> >> >>> Can you please show me how you would do that in the loop? This is also >> >>> a huge data set ... >> >>> >> >>> Thanks >> >>> Ana >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 2:34 PM Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> If you just want to permute columns of a matrix, >> >>>> >> >>>> ?sample >> >>>>> sample.int(10) >> >>>> [1] 9 2 10 8 4 6 3 1 5 7 >> >>>> >> >>>> and you can just use this as an index into the columns of your matrix, presumably within a loop of some sort. >> >>>> >> >>>> If I have misunderstood, just ignore. >> >>>> >> >>>> Cheers, >> >>>> Bert >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 12:23 PM Ana Marija <sokovic.anamarija at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Hello, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I have a matrix >> >>>>>> dim(dat) >> >>>>> [1] 15568 132 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> It looks like this: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> NoD_14381_norm.1 NoD_14381_norm.2 NoD_14381_norm.3 >> >>>>> NoD_14520_30mM.1 NoD_14520_30mM.2 NoD_14520_30mM.3 >> >>>>> Ku8QhfS0n_hIOABXuE 4.75 4.25 4.79 >> >>>>> 4.33 4.63 3.85 >> >>>>> Bx496XsFXiAlj.Eaeo 6.15 6.23 6.55 >> >>>>> 6.26 6.24 5.99 >> >>>>> W38p0ogk.wIBVRXllY 7.13 7.35 7.55 >> >>>>> 7.37 7.36 7.55 >> >>>>> QIBkqIS9LR5DfTlTS8 6.27 6.73 6.45 >> >>>>> 5.39 4.75 4.96 >> >>>>> BZKiEvS0eQ305U0v34 6.35 7.02 6.76 >> >>>>> 5.45 5.25 5.02 >> >>>>> 6TheVd.HiE1UF3lX6g 5.53 5.02 5.36 >> >>>>> 5.61 5.66 5.37 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> So it is a matrix with gene names ex. Ku8QhfS0n_hIOABXuE, and subjects >> >>>>> named ex. NoD_14381_norm.1 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> How to do 1000 permutations of these 132 columns and on each created >> >>>>> new permuted matrix perform this code: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> subject="all_replicate" >> >>>>> targets<-readTargets(paste(PhenotypeDir,"hg_sg_",subject,"_target.txt", sep='')) >> >>>>> Treat <- factor(targets$Treatment,levels=c("C","T")) >> >>>>> Replicates <- factor(targets$rep) >> >>>>> design <- model.matrix(~Replicates+Treat) >> >>>>> corfit <- duplicateCorrelation(dat, block = targets$Subject) >> >>>>> corfit$consensus.correlation >> >>>>> fit <-lmFit(dat,design,block=targets$Subject,correlation=corfit$consensus.correlation) >> >>>>> fit<-eBayes(fit) >> >>>>> qval.cutoff=0.1; FC.cutoff=0.17 >> >>>>> y1=topTable(fit, coef="TreatT", n=nrow(genes),adjust.method="BH",genelist=genes) >> >>>>> >> >>>>> y1 for each iteration of permutation would have P.Value column and >> >>>>> these I would have plotted on the end to find the distribution of all >> >>>>> p values generated in those 1000 permutations. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Please advise, >> >>>>> Ana >> >>>>> >> >>>>> ______________________________________________ >> >>>>> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see >> >>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >> >>>>> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html >> >>>>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. >> > >> > ______________________________________________ >> > R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see >> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >> > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html >> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. >> > >>
Ivan Krylov
2020-Feb-05 16:11 UTC
[R] doing 1000 permutations and doing test statistics distribution
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 09:15:16 -0600 Ana Marija <sokovic.anamarija at gmail.com> wrote:> I tried to solve the task via following code:> all_results <- lapply(manyorders, function(ord) {# ...> list(fit = fit, y1 = y1) > })> and I wrote all_results in a file > write.table(all_results, file="all_res", sep = " ", row.names = FALSE, > col.names = TRUE,quote=FALSE)all_results is a list of lists of pairs of data.frames and MArrayLM S3 objects, while write.table works best with data.frames (or things that make sense when coerced to a data.frame). I am afraid that the result of coercing a list of lists of lists into a data.frame may not make sense. What do you need the "all_res" file for? If you just want persistence (save the data between runs of R programs, but not examine it manually), consider using saveRDS/readRDS instead. If you need to interoperate with non-R programs or want a text file for transparency reasons, read on.> when I tried to open the file: > > a=read.table("all_res", header=T) > Error in read.table("all_res", header = T) : > more columns than column namesDo any of the strings stored in all_results contain spaces? (y1[,'genelist'] might.) A combination of sep=" " and quote=FALSE could make such data impossible to read back unambiguously. Does it help to re-enable quote=TRUE or switch to a different sep (like "\t") that's guaranteed to be absent from strings you are trying to save? Either way, read.table() will not reconstruct the same all_results that was fed to write.table() previously unless all_results is already a data.frame (which it isn't). -- Best regards, Ivan