Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D.
2019-Oct-19 13:04 UTC
[R] "chi-square" | "chi-squared" | "chi squared" | "chi, square"
Martin, ? A fun question. Looking back at my oldest books, Feller (1950) used chi-square. Then I walked down the hall to our little statistics library and looked at Johnson and Kotz, "Continous Univariate Distributions", since each chapter therein has comments about the history of the distribution. ?a.? They use 'chi-square' throughout their history section, tracing the distribution back to work in the 1800s.? But, those earliest papers apparently didn't name their results as chi- whatever, so an "origin" story didn't pan out. ?b. They have 13 pages of references, and for fun I counted the occurence of variants.? The majority of papers don't have the word in the title at all and the next most common is the Greek symbol. Here are the years of the others: chi-square: ? 73 43 65 80 86 73 82 73 69 69 78 64 64 86 65 86 82 82 76 82 88 81 74 77 87 86 93 69 60 88 88 80 77 41 59 79 31 chi-squared: 72 76 82 83 89 79 69 67 77 78 69 77 83 88 87 89 78 chi:? 92 73 89 87 chi-squares: 77 83 chi-bar-square: 91 There doesn't look to be a trend over time.? The 1922 Fisher reference uses the Greek symbol, by the way. Terry T [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
William Dunlap
2019-Oct-19 15:59 UTC
[R] "chi-square" | "chi-squared" | "chi squared" | "chi, square"
Sigma squared or sigma square? Hotelling's T-squared or T-square? Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 7:38 AM Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-help < r-help at r-project.org> wrote:> Martin, > A fun question. > > Looking back at my oldest books, Feller (1950) used chi-square. > Then I walked down the hall to our little statistics library and looked at > Johnson and > Kotz, "Continous Univariate Distributions", since each chapter therein has > comments about > the history of the distribution. > > a. They use 'chi-square' throughout their history section, tracing the > distribution > back to work in the 1800s. But, those earliest papers apparently didn't > name their > results as chi- whatever, so an "origin" story didn't pan out. > > b. They have 13 pages of references, and for fun I counted the occurence > of variants. > The majority of papers don't have the word in the title at all and the > next most common is > the Greek symbol. Here are the years of the others: > > chi-square: 73 43 65 80 86 73 82 73 69 69 78 64 64 86 65 86 82 82 76 82 > 88 81 74 77 87 > 86 93 69 60 88 88 80 77 41 59 79 31 > chi-squared: 72 76 82 83 89 79 69 67 77 78 69 77 83 88 87 89 78 > chi: 92 73 89 87 > chi-squares: 77 83 > chi-bar-square: 91 > > There doesn't look to be a trend over time. The 1922 Fisher reference > uses the Greek > symbol, by the way. > > Terry T > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. >[[alternative HTML version deleted]]