Hi
Sorry, I think this has always been the behaviour (and the documentation
has always been wrong).
Using locator() yourself could be a workaround (with a little more
effort required to determine the closest data point).
Paul
On 16/02/18 09:32, Samuel GRANJEAUD IR/INSERM wrote:> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for your answer. I am wondering if in the previous versions,
> let's say 2.1x, the data were in the selection order... Let me know if
> there a R fonction taht I can code. Do you think I should use locator
> function and match points on my own?
>
> Best,
> Samuel
--
Dr Paul Murrell
Department of Statistics
The University of Auckland
Private Bag 92019
Auckland
New Zealand
64 9 3737599 x85392
paul at stat.auckland.ac.nz
http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~paul/