Michael Dewey
2017-Jun-24 12:18 UTC
[R] Comparing pooled proportions(complication and reoperation rates) of different treatment modalities
Note though that this has been put on hold on stats.stackexchange.com as off-topic. On 23/06/2017 19:33, Bert Gunter wrote:> Probably the wrong list. R-help is concerned with R programming, not > statistics methodology questions, although the intersection can be > nonempty. > > I suggest you post on stats.stackexchange.com instead, which *is* > concerned with statistics methodology questions. > > > Cheers, > Bert > > > Bert Gunter > > "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along > and sticking things into it." > -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) > > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Jay Zola <jayjay.1988 at hotmail.nl> wrote: >> Dear sir/madame, >> >> >> I am currently writing a meta-analysis on the complication and reoperation rates of 5 different treatment modalities after a distal radius fracture. I was able to pool the rates of the 5 different rates using R. Now I have to compare the pooled rates of the 4 treatment modalities with the golden standard separately. I though the chi squared test would be the best method. How do I do that using r. The R code I have used for the former calculation are added as a Word-file attachment. Your help would be highly appreciated. >> >> >> Yours sincerely, >> >> >> Student >> ______________________________________________ >> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html >> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > http://www.avg.com > >-- Michael http://www.dewey.myzen.co.uk/home.html
Jay Zola
2017-Jun-26 05:53 UTC
[R] Comparing pooled proportions(complication and reoperation rates) of different treatment modalities
What is the best way to change my R code to be able to compare the pooled proportions(complication and reoperation rates) with the Chi square method? Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone> Op 24 jun. 2017 om 14:18 heeft Michael Dewey <lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk> het volgende geschreven: > > Note though that this has been put on hold on stats.stackexchange.com as off-topic. > >> On 23/06/2017 19:33, Bert Gunter wrote: >> Probably the wrong list. R-help is concerned with R programming, not >> statistics methodology questions, although the intersection can be >> nonempty. >> >> I suggest you post on stats.stackexchange.com instead, which *is* >> concerned with statistics methodology questions. >> >> >> Cheers, >> Bert >> >> >> Bert Gunter >> >> "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along >> and sticking things into it." >> -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) >> >> >>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Jay Zola <jayjay.1988 at hotmail.nl> wrote: >>> Dear sir/madame, >>> >>> >>> I am currently writing a meta-analysis on the complication and reoperation rates of 5 different treatment modalities after a distal radius fracture. I was able to pool the rates of the 5 different rates using R. Now I have to compare the pooled rates of the 4 treatment modalities with the golden standard separately. I though the chi squared test would be the best method. How do I do that using r. The R code I have used for the former calculation are added as a Word-file attachment. Your help would be highly appreciated. >>> >>> >>> Yours sincerely, >>> >>> >>> Student >>> ______________________________________________ >>> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >>> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html >>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html >> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. >> http://www.avg.com >> >> > > -- > Michael > http://www.dewey.myzen.co.uk/home.html
Jay Zola
2017-Jun-26 14:23 UTC
[R] Comparing pooled proportions(complication and reoperation rates) of different treatment modalities
Op 26 jun. 2017 om 15:22 heeft Jay Zola <jayjay.1988 at hotmail.nl<mailto:jayjay.1988 at hotmail.nl>> het volgende geschreven: What is the best way to change my R code to be able to compare the pooled proportions(complication and reoperation rates) with the Chi square method? Just adding an adjustment to the links because they were not working correctly. Dataset on my dropbox: https://www.dropbox.com/s/j1urqzr99bt76ip/Basics%20excel%20file%20complication%20and%20reoperation%20rate.xlsx?dl=0 R code on my dropbox: https://wwwdropbox.com/s/67pnfpi10qu110v/R%20code%20voor%20forrest%20en%20funnel%20plots.rtf?dl=0 Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone Op 24 jun. 2017 om 14:18 heeft Michael Dewey <lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk<mailto:lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk>> het volgende geschreven: Note though that this has been put on hold on stats.stackexchange.com<http://stats.stackexchange.com> as off-topic. On 23/06/2017 19:33, Bert Gunter wrote: Probably the wrong list. R-help is concerned with R programming, not statistics methodology questions, although the intersection can be nonempty. I suggest you post on stats.stackexchange.com<http://stats.stackexchange.com> instead, which *is* concerned with statistics methodology questions. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Jay Zola <jayjay.1988 at hotmail.nl<mailto:jayjay.1988 at hotmail.nl>> wrote: Dear sir/madame, I am currently writing a meta-analysis on the complication and reoperation rates of 5 different treatment modalities after a distal radius fracture. I was able to pool the rates of the 5 different rates using R. Now I have to compare the pooled rates of the 4 treatment modalities with the golden standard separately. I though the chi squared test would be the best method. How do I do that using r. The R code I have used for the former calculation are added as a Word-file attachment. Your help would be highly appreciated. Yours sincerely, Student ______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org<mailto:R-help at r-project.org> mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. ______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org<mailto:R-help at r-project.org> mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com -- Michael http://www.dewey.myzen.co.uk/home.html ______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org<mailto:R-help at r-project.org> mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Reasonably Related Threads
- Comparing pooled proportions(complication and reoperation rates) of different treatment modalities
- Comparing pooled proportions(complication and reoperation rates) of different treatment modalities
- Comparing pooled proportions(complication and reoperation rates) of different treatment modalities
- Comparing pooled proportions(complication and reoperation rates) of different treatment modalities
- Comparing pooled proportions(complication and reoperation rates) of different treatment modalities