Hi all, I want to use tabu search to solve my minimization problem. but tabu search in R is for maximization, so I turn my function from f to -f? but the eUtilityKeep always be 0 from the second position. I have go through a part of source code found that it always give the default value to compare, move <- ifelse(maxTaboo > maxNontaboo & maxTaboo > aspiration, ifelse(length(which(neighboursEUtility == maxTaboo)) == 1, which(neighboursEUtility == maxTaboo), sample(which(neighboursEUtility == maxTaboo), 1)), ifelse(length(which(neighboursEUtility == maxNontaboo & tabuList == 0)) == 1, which(neighboursEUtility == maxNontaboo & tabuList == 0), sample(which(neighboursEUtility == maxNontaboo & tabuList == 0), 1))) this cause the 0 value. How can I use it to get my minimization value using tabu search in R ? Thanks .
Enrico Schumann
2017-Jun-20 13:42 UTC
[R] Can I use tabu search for minimization problem ?
Zitat von Mars Xu <xujiao.mycafe at gmail.com>:> Hi all, > I want to use tabu search to solve my minimization problem. but > tabu search in R is for maximization, so I turn my function from f > to -f? but the eUtilityKeep always be 0 from the second position. I > have go through a part of source code found that it always give the > default value to compare, > > move <- ifelse(maxTaboo > maxNontaboo & maxTaboo > aspiration, > ifelse(length(which(neighboursEUtility == > maxTaboo)) == 1, > which(neighboursEUtility == > maxTaboo), sample(which(neighboursEUtility == maxTaboo), 1)), > ifelse(length(which(neighboursEUtility == > maxNontaboo & tabuList == 0)) == 1, > which(neighboursEUtility == > maxNontaboo & tabuList == 0), sample(which(neighboursEUtility == > maxNontaboo & tabuList == 0), 1))) > > this cause the 0 value. > > How can I use it to get my minimization value using tabu search in R ? > > Thanks .If you want people to help you, provide a minimal (or, at least, small) reproducible code example. In particular, tell people what package(s) you are using. -- Enrico Schumann Lucerne, Switzerland http://enricoschumann.net
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc linking errors
- VAD performance worse on version 1.2rc1 than 1.1.12
- Register Allocation Graph Coloring algorithm and Others
- VAD performance worse on version 1.2rc1 than 1.1.12
- preprocessor VAD only rocognize between silence andnot silence