All approaches have strong points and weak points. Your question has no clear
answer.
I happen to like dplyr for many things (including lots of timestamp values), but
base R is always there to solve problems if the analysis framework-du-jour has
troubles. So learn base R ways of doing things if nothing else.
For next time: please read the Posting Guide. Give us a minimal example in R of
what you are trying to accomplish along with your description and what you think
the right answer will look like (consider using the reprex R package), and turn
off HTML in your email program at least for your mails sent to this list because
HTML gets damaged to varying degrees by the mailing list and then we are left
puzzled about what you were asking.
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
On April 28, 2017 8:13:18 AM PDT, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com>
wrote:>Hi All?
>
>I am often working with large datasets with multiple variables
>(integer,
>decimal, string, complex, date, and time) that require processing,
>cleaning, etc. I am relatively new to R and I would like to get some
>input
>on the following issue: I am trying to figure out which R-package(s) is
>most suitable for my work. I looked into data.table and dplyr. Both are
>very good but I found out that data.table does not handle time data
>well
>(one has to use fast time package) and not sure whether dplyr does the
>same
>or not. I am not sure about their handling of other variables listed
>above.
>I like data.table.
>
>
>The questions: (1) which package should I invest on learning and how to
>deal with issue like time data and possibly other variables such
>complex
>numbers, date, etc.? (2) What is the ?best? practical solution for such
>issue?
>
>
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>
>EKE
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>______________________________________________
>R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>PLEASE do read the posting guide
>http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.