Dear Frank,
Thank you for the quick response.
I am familiar with the tradeoffs between integers and doubles. However, I do
not believe this answers my question.
If you look at the help information for the as() function it says: "as(x,
"numeric") uses the existing as.numeric function." But clearly
the result is different in each case.
If the help for as() is correct, then as(1:10, "numeric") should also
return doubles, and the second argument is not ignored.
Erik
> On Feb 1, 2016, at 8:16 AM, Franklin Bretschneider <bretschr at
xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
> Dear Erik Wright,
>
>
> Re:
>
>> Could someone please explain this R behavior to me:
>>
>>> typeof(as.numeric(1:10))
>> [1] "double"
>>> typeof(as(1:10, "numeric"))
>> [1] "integer"
>>
>> I expected "double" in both cases. In the help for the
"as" function it says:
>>
>> "Methods are pre-defined for coercing any object to one of the
basic datatypes. For example, as(x, "numeric") uses the existing
as.numeric function."
>
>
> This happens because 1:10 yields only integers, and so can be stored cheap,
> whereas as.numeric() actually means: as.double.
> The "numeric" in the second line is an unused argument.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Frank
> ---
>
>
>
>
> Franklin Bretschneider
> Dept of Biology
> Utrecht University
> bretschr at xs4all.nl
>
>
>