Dear Andrew,
Thank you for your reply. Its an R question. The weeks are coded as 1-53
for each year and I would like to control weeks and years as time fixed
effects.
Will this be an issue if I estimate this type of regression using the LFE
package?
felm(outcome ~ temperature + precipitation | city + year + week
Thanks again!
Sincerely,
MS
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Andrew Crane-Droesch <andrewcd at
gmail.com>
wrote:
> Is this an R question or an econometrics question? I'll assume that it
is
> an R question. If your weeks are coded sequentially (i.e.: weeks since a
> particular date), then they'll be strictly determined by year. If
however
> you're interested in the effect of a particular week of the year (week
7,
> for example), then you'll need to recode your week variable as a factor
> with 52 levels. For that you'd likely need the "%%"
operator. For example:
>
> 1> 1:10%%3
> [1] 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1
>
>
>
>
> On 11/14/2015 05:18 PM, Miluji Sb wrote:
>
>> I have weekly panel data for more than a hundred cities. The
independent
>> variables are temperature and precipitation. The time dimensions are
year
>> and week and likely have time invariant characteristics and are all
>> important for proper estimation.
>>
>> Could I use the LFE (or plm) package to estimate something like this by
>> including the location and two time fixed-effects?
>>
>> felm(outcome ~ temperature + precipitation | city + year + week
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> MS
>>
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>
>
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]