Hi Hans,
Thanks for your comments!
I need the linear inequality constraints so nlsLM is not a candidate.
I am also looking at the functions mma and slsqp in R package nloptr. Compared
with constrOptim(), which approach would you recommend?
Thanks,
Xue
-----Original Message-----
From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Hans W
Borchers
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 6:22 AM
To: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] lsqlin in R package pracma
On Mon Aug 24 Wang, Xue, Ph.D. Wang.Xue at mayo.edu
wrote> I am looking for a R version of Matlab function lsqlin. I came across
> R pracma package which has a lsqlin function. Compared with Matlab
> lsqlin, the R version does not allow inequality constraints.
> I am wondering if this functionality will be available in future. And
> also like to get your opinion on which R package/function is the best
> for
solving> least square minimization problem with linear inequality constraints.
> Thanks very much for your time and attention!
Solving (linear) least-squares problems with linear inequality constraints is
more difficult then one would expect. Inspecting the MATLAB code reveals that it
employs advanced methods such as active-set (linear inequality
constraints) and interior-point (for bounds constraints).
Function nlsLM() in package *minpack.lm* supports bound constraints if that is
sufficient for you. The same is true for *nlmrt*. Convex optimization might be a
promising approach for linear inequality constraints, but there is no
easy-to-handle convex solver in R at this moment.
So the most straightforward way would be to use constrOptim(), that is optim
with linear constraints. It requires a reasonable starting point, and keeping
your fingers crossed that you are able to find such a point in the interior of
the feasible region.
I someone wants to try: Here is the example from the MATLAB "lsqlin"
page:
C <- matrix(c(
0.9501, 0.7620, 0.6153, 0.4057,
0.2311, 0.4564, 0.7919, 0.9354,
0.6068, 0.0185, 0.9218, 0.9169,
0.4859, 0.8214, 0.7382, 0.4102,
0.8912, 0.4447, 0.1762, 0.8936), 5, 4, byrow=TRUE)
d <- c(0.0578, 0.3528, 0.8131, 0.0098, 0.1388)
A <- matrix(c(
0.2027, 0.2721, 0.7467, 0.4659,
0.1987, 0.1988, 0.4450, 0.4186,
0.6037, 0.0152, 0.9318, 0.8462), 3, 4, byrow=TRUE)
b <- c(0.5251, 0.2026, 0.6721)
The least-square function to be minimized is ||C x - d||_2 , and the
constraints are A x <= b :
f <- function(x) sum((C %*% x - d)^2)
The solution x0 returned by MATLAB has a minimum of f(x0) = 0.01759204 .
This point does not lie in the interior and cannot be used for a start.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.