Hi Petr, Probably i did not explain my scenario clearly. table(test$ORIGIN_NAME,is.na(test$SCH_TIME)) is the syntax with which i am trying to find per destination wise how many instances are there where system failed to enter the scheduled delivery time & there are multiple cases of these. I am expecting an output where TRUE and FALSE will give number of observations either missing or non-missing. ORIGIN ORIGIN_NAME DESTINATION DESTINATION_NM RPS_NO DLI11 DELHI-11 NDA50 NOIDA-50 1350760 NDA50 NOIDA-50 DLI11 DELHI-11 1352692 SCH_TIME ACTUAL_DEP_DATE ACTUAL_DEP_TIME WAYBILLS TOTAL_PKG ACTUAL_WT CHG_WT 6:00 13/03/2015 6:30 - 0 0 0 21:30 15/03/2015 13:37 28 256 3419 3730 Hopefully i am able to make my self now clear. Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Missing-Values-in-Table-Statement-tp4708534p4708537.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Petr, Please see the output from dget as follows.
ORIGIN ORIGIN_NAME DESTINATION DESTINATION_NM RPS_NO
VENDOR_NAME CR_DT SCHD_MRKT VHL_NO vhl_cap
1 DLI11 DELHI-11 NDA50 NOIDA-50 1350760
RAJIV GAUTAM 13-Mar-15 SCHEDULE HR63A0931 8
2 DLI11 DELHI-11 NDA50 NOIDA-50 1366368
RAJIV GAUTAM 31-Mar-15 SCHEDULE HR63A0931 8
3 NDA50 NOIDA-50 DLI11 DELHI-11 1352692
RAJIV GAUTAM 15-Mar-15 SCHEDULE HR63A0931 8
4 NDA50 NOIDA-50 NDA11 NOIDA-11 1354642
RAJIV GAUTAM 17-Mar-15 MARKET HR63A0931 8
5 NDA50 NOIDA-50 DLI11 DELHI-11 1354642
RAJIV GAUTAM 17-Mar-15 MARKET HR63A0931 8
SCH_TIME ACTUAL_DEP_DATE ACTUAL_DEP_TIME WAYBILLS TOTAL_PKG ACTUAL_WT
CHG_WT RTE_CD
1 6:00 13/03/2015 6:30 - 0 0
0 DELHI-11-NOIDA-50(DLI11-NDA50)
2 6:00 31/03/2015 4:05 - 0 0
0 DELHI-11-NOIDA-50(DLI11-NDA50)
3 21:30 15/03/2015 13:37 - 0 0
0 NOIDA-50-DELHI-11(NDA50-DLI11)
4 17/03/2015 20:15 3 40 744
770 NOIDA-50-DELHI-11(NDA50-NDA11-DLI11)
5 17/03/2015 20:15 28 256 3419
3730 NOIDA-50-DELHI-11(NDA50-NDA11-DLI11)
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Missing-Values-in-Table-Statement-tp4708534p4708540.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi> -----Original Message----- > From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Shivi82 > Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 8:28 AM > To: r-help at r-project.org > Subject: Re: [R] Missing Values in Table Statement > > Hi Petr, > > Probably i did not explain my scenario clearly. > table(test$ORIGIN_NAME,is.na(test$SCH_TIME)) is the syntax with whichThis is what **I** get.> table(test$ORIGIN_NAME,is.na(test$SCH_TIME))Error in table(test$ORIGIN_NAME, is.na(test$SCH_TIME)) : object 'test' not found>> i am trying to find per destination wise how many instances are there > where system failed to enter the scheduled delivery time & there are > multiple cases of these. I am expecting an output where TRUE and FALSEAs I said output of table is not logical but numeric.> will give number of observations either missing or non-missing. > > ORIGIN ORIGIN_NAME DESTINATION DESTINATION_NM RPS_NO > DLI11 DELHI-11 NDA50 NOIDA-50 > 1350760 > NDA50 NOIDA-50 DLI11 DELHI-11 > 1352692 > > > SCH_TIME ACTUAL_DEP_DATE ACTUAL_DEP_TIME WAYBILLS TOTAL_PKG ACTUAL_WT > CHG_WT > 6:00 13/03/2015 6:30 - > 0 0 0 > 21:30 15/03/2015 13:37 28 > 256 3419 3730 > > > Hopefully i am able to make my self now clear. Thank you.Not really. Cheers Petr> > > -- > View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Missing- > Values-in-Table-Statement-tp4708534p4708537.html > Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting- > guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.________________________________ Tento e-mail a jak?koliv k n?mu p?ipojen? dokumenty jsou d?v?rn? a jsou ur?eny pouze jeho adres?t?m. Jestli?e jste obdr?el(a) tento e-mail omylem, informujte laskav? neprodlen? jeho odes?latele. Obsah tohoto emailu i s p??lohami a jeho kopie vyma?te ze sv?ho syst?mu. Nejste-li zam??len?m adres?tem tohoto emailu, nejste opr?vn?ni tento email jakkoliv u??vat, roz?i?ovat, kop?rovat ?i zve?ej?ovat. Odes?latel e-mailu neodpov?d? za eventu?ln? ?kodu zp?sobenou modifikacemi ?i zpo?d?n?m p?enosu e-mailu. V p??pad?, ?e je tento e-mail sou??st? obchodn?ho jedn?n?: - vyhrazuje si odes?latel pr?vo ukon?it kdykoliv jedn?n? o uzav?en? smlouvy, a to z jak?hokoliv d?vodu i bez uveden? d?vodu. - a obsahuje-li nab?dku, je adres?t opr?vn?n nab?dku bezodkladn? p?ijmout; Odes?latel tohoto e-mailu (nab?dky) vylu?uje p?ijet? nab?dky ze strany p??jemce s dodatkem ?i odchylkou. - trv? odes?latel na tom, ?e p??slu?n? smlouva je uzav?ena teprve v?slovn?m dosa?en?m shody na v?ech jej?ch n?le?itostech. - odes?latel tohoto emailu informuje, ?e nen? opr?vn?n uzav?rat za spole?nost ??dn? smlouvy s v?jimkou p??pad?, kdy k tomu byl p?semn? zmocn?n nebo p?semn? pov??en a takov? pov??en? nebo pln? moc byly adres?tovi tohoto emailu p??padn? osob?, kterou adres?t zastupuje, p?edlo?eny nebo jejich existence je adres?tovi ?i osob? j?m zastoupen? zn?m?. This e-mail and any documents attached to it may be confidential and are intended only for its intended recipients. If you received this e-mail by mistake, please immediately inform its sender. Delete the contents of this e-mail with all attachments and its copies from your system. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are not authorized to use, disseminate, copy or disclose this e-mail in any manner. The sender of this e-mail shall not be liable for any possible damage caused by modifications of the e-mail or by delay with transfer of the email. In case that this e-mail forms part of business dealings: - the sender reserves the right to end negotiations about entering into a contract in any time, for any reason, and without stating any reasoning. - if the e-mail contains an offer, the recipient is entitled to immediately accept such offer; The sender of this e-mail (offer) excludes any acceptance of the offer on the part of the recipient containing any amendment or variation. - the sender insists on that the respective contract is concluded only upon an express mutual agreement on all its aspects. - the sender of this e-mail informs that he/she is not authorized to enter into any contracts on behalf of the company except for cases in which he/she is expressly authorized to do so in writing, and such authorization or power of attorney is submitted to the recipient or the person represented by the recipient, or the existence of such authorization is known to the recipient of the person represented by the recipient.
Maybe it will help if I create some fake data to illustrate what I think
you want:
set.seed(25)
tmp <- data.frame(origin=sample( letters[1:3], 25, replace=TRUE),
schd= sample( 1:5, 25, replace=TRUE)
)
tmp$schd[ c(5,7,18,22) ] <- NA
print(tmp)
table( tmp$origin, is.na(tmp$schd))
FALSE TRUE
a 9 1
b 6 2
c 6 1
## a little fancier
table( tmp$origin,
ifelse(is.na(tmp$schd),'missing','available'))
available missing
a 9 1
b 6 2
c 6 1
For example, for schedule "b" there are 6 instances for which the
sched
time has been entered and 2 where it has not.
In this example, the table() function is working correctly.
I don't think anyone understands what is wrong with the output you are
getting.
--
Don MacQueen
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
7000 East Ave., L-627
Livermore, CA 94550
925-423-1062
On 6/11/15, 11:27 PM, "Shivi82" <shivibhatia at ymail.com>
wrote:
>Hi Petr,
>
>Probably i did not explain my scenario clearly.
> table(test$ORIGIN_NAME,is.na(test$SCH_TIME)) is the syntax with which i
>am
>trying to find per destination wise how many instances are there where
>system failed to enter the scheduled delivery time & there are multiple
>cases of these. I am expecting an output where TRUE and FALSE will give
>number of observations either missing or non-missing.
>
>ORIGIN ORIGIN_NAME DESTINATION DESTINATION_NM RPS_NO
>DLI11 DELHI-11 NDA50 NOIDA-50
>
>1350760
>NDA50 NOIDA-50 DLI11 DELHI-11
>
>1352692
>
>
>SCH_TIME ACTUAL_DEP_DATE ACTUAL_DEP_TIME WAYBILLS TOTAL_PKG ACTUAL_WT
>CHG_WT
>6:00 13/03/2015 6:30 -
>
>0 0 0
>21:30 15/03/2015 13:37 28
>
>256 3419 3730
>
>
>Hopefully i am able to make my self now clear. Thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Missing-Values-in-Table-Statement-tp4708534p
>4708537.html
>Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>______________________________________________
>R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>PLEASE do read the posting guide
>http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
HI Don,
This is the exact result i need. However in my case i am not getting any
value under TRUE whereas FALSE captures total observations in each variable.
Please find the syntax and output from the code:
table(test$ORIGIN_NAME,is.na(test$SCH_TIME))
Output
FALSE
BAHADURGARH 15
BAREILLY 44
BAWAL 34
DELHI-11 2446
DELHI-39 170
DELHI-40 86
DELHI NCR-12 1925
The data from str is attached:
data.frame': 10765 obs. of 18 variables:
$ ORIGIN : chr "DLI11" "DLI11" "NDA50"
"NDA50" ...
$ ORIGIN_NAME : chr "DELHI-11" "DELHI-11"
"NOIDA-50" "NOIDA-50" ...
$ DESTINATION : chr "NDA50" "NDA50" "DLI11"
"NDA11" ...
$ DESTINATION_NM : chr "NOIDA-50" "NOIDA-50"
"DELHI-11" "NOIDA-11" ...
$ RPS_NO : int 1350760 1366368 1352692 1354642 1354642 1349180
1349180 1356091 1348591 1348591 ...
$ VENDOR_NAME : chr "RAJIV GAUTAM" "RAJIV GAUTAM"
"RAJIV GAUTAM" "RAJIV
GAUTAM" ...
$ CR_DT : chr "13-Mar-15" "31-Mar-15"
"15-Mar-15" "17-Mar-15" ...
$ SCHD_MRKT : chr "SCHEDULE" "SCHEDULE"
"SCHEDULE" "MARKET" ...
$ VHL_NO : chr "HR63A0931" "HR63A0931"
"HR63A0931" "HR63A0931" ...
$ vhl_cap : int 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ...
$ SCH_TIME : chr "6:00" "6:00" "21:30"
"" ...
$ ACTUAL_DEP_DATE: chr "13/03/2015" "31/03/2015"
"15/03/2015" "17/03/2015"
...
$ ACTUAL_DEP_TIME: chr "6:30" "4:05" "13:37"
"20:15" ...
$ WAYBILLS : chr "-" "-" "-" "3"
...
$ TOTAL_PKG : int 0 0 0 40 256 6 0 0 16 427 ...
$ ACTUAL_WT : int 0 0 0 744 3419 65 0 0 193 7223 ...
$ CHG_WT : int 0 0 0 770 3730 70 0 0 210 7310 ...
$ RTE_CD : chr "DELHI-11-NOIDA-50(DLI11-NDA50)"
"DELHI-11-NOIDA-50(DLI11-NDA50)"
"NOIDA-50-DELHI-11(NDA50-DLI11)"
"NOIDA-50-DELHI-11(NDA50-NDA11-DLI11)"
Scheduled time here is character, could this be the reason for the incorrect
result.
Thanks, Shivi
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Missing-Values-in-Table-Statement-tp4708534p4708593.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.