R help - Feb 2015 - How to read this Rpart decision tree?

Hi all, 

In the attachment or this link (http://oi58.tinypic.com/35ic9qc.jpg) you'll
find the decision tree I made. I used the Rpart package to make the tree and the
rattle package using the fancyRpartPlot to plot it. The data in the tree looks
different than about every example I have seen before. I don't understand
how I should read it. I want to predict Product (which are productkeys). The
variables to predict it contain age, incomegroup, gender, totalchildren,
education, occupation, houseownerflag, numberCars.It looks like the upper number
is a ProductKey. The "n" is number of observations? And the percentage
of the yes/no question below.

This is the code I used.  
> ss.rpart1 <- rpart(Product ~ ., data=sstrain,
control=rpart.control(minbucket=2,minsplit=1, cp=-1))
> spt <- which.min(ss.rpart1$cptable[, "xerror"])
> scp <- ss.rpart1$cptable[opt, "CP"]
> ss.rpart2 <- prune(ss.rpart1, cp=cp)
> fancyRpartPlot(ss.rpart2)
So why does the tree looks so different from the most (for example:
http://media.tumblr.com/a9f482ff88b0b9cfaffca7ffd46c6a8e/tumblr_inline_mz7pyuaYJQ1s5wtly.png).
This is from Trevor Stephen's TItanic tutorial. The first node show that 62%
of 100% doesn't survive. If they were male, only 19% of them were survivors.
I find that a lot examples look like that. Why does mine predict per ProductKey
and every node it has something else. it doesn't make sense to me. And it
doesn't have the two numbers like .62 and .38 but it has n=197e+3. So should
I read the first node like "For 100% of the observations of ProductKey
1074, the incomegroup was moderate)"?

Thank you!

Kim


 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ssrpart2.png
Type: image/png
Size: 64401 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20150211/4d0658ed/attachment.png>

Hi Kim

fancyRpartPlot is a front-end to prp, and you can pass it all of the
prp options - it says this in the help for fancyRpartPlot, and that's
about all it says.

So you need to spend some time reading about prp options, and how to
customize your plot to get what you want. There are lots of detailed
resources; here's one to get you started.

http://www.milbo.org/rpart-plot/prp.pdf

Sarah

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Kim C. <minorthreatx at hotmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In the attachment or this link (http://oi58.tinypic.com/35ic9qc.jpg)
you'll find the decision tree I made. I used the Rpart package to make the
tree and the rattle package using the fancyRpartPlot to plot it. The data in the
tree looks different than about every example I have seen before. I don't
understand how I should read it. I want to predict Product (which are
productkeys). The variables to predict it contain age, incomegroup, gender,
totalchildren, education, occupation, houseownerflag, numberCars.It looks like
the upper number is a ProductKey. The "n" is number of observations?
And the percentage of the yes/no question below.
>
> This is the code I used.
>
>> ss.rpart1 <- rpart(Product ~ ., data=sstrain,
control=rpart.control(minbucket=2,minsplit=1, cp=-1))
>> spt <- which.min(ss.rpart1$cptable[, "xerror"])
>> scp <- ss.rpart1$cptable[opt, "CP"]
>> ss.rpart2 <- prune(ss.rpart1, cp=cp)
>> fancyRpartPlot(ss.rpart2)
>
> So why does the tree looks so different from the most (for example:
http://media.tumblr.com/a9f482ff88b0b9cfaffca7ffd46c6a8e/tumblr_inline_mz7pyuaYJQ1s5wtly.png).
This is from Trevor Stephen's TItanic tutorial. The first node show that 62%
of 100% doesn't survive. If they were male, only 19% of them were survivors.
I find that a lot examples look like that. Why does mine predict per ProductKey
and every node it has something else. it doesn't make sense to me. And it
doesn't have the two numbers like .62 and .38 but it has n=197e+3. So should
I read the first node like "For 100% of the observations of ProductKey
1074, the incomegroup was moderate)"?
>
> Thank you!
>
> Kim
>
-- 
Sarah Goslee
http://www.functionaldiversity.org