Ivan Krylov
2023-Aug-13 11:16 UTC
[Rd] R-4.3 version list.files function could not work correctly in chinese
Found it! Looks like a buffer length problem. This isn't limited to Chinese, just more likely to happen when a character takes three bytes to represent in UTF-8. (Any filename containing characters which take more than one byte to represent in UTF-8 may fail.) If a directory contains a file with a sufficiently long name, FindNextFile() fails with ERROR_MORE_DATA (0xEA, 234), making R_readdir() return NULL, stopping list_files() prematurely: # everything seems to work fine... list.files("????") # [1] "????-non-utf8-????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????.txt" # [2] "????-non-utf8-?????.txt" # [3] "????-utf-8.txt" # now create a file with an even longer name list.files("????") # [1] "????-non-utf8-????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????.txt" # the files are still there, but not visible to list.files(): system("cmd /c dir /s *.txt") # Volume in drive C has no label. # Volume Serial Number is A85A-AA74 # # Directory of C:\R\R-4.3.1\bin\x64\???? # # 08/12/2023 07:57 AM 22 ????-non-utf8-????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????.txt # 08/12/2023 07:57 AM 22 ????-non-utf8-????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????.txt # 08/12/2023 07:57 AM 22 ????-non-utf8-?????.txt # 08/12/2023 07:56 AM 18 ????-utf-8.txt # 4 File(s) 84 bytes # # Total Files Listed: # 4 File(s) 84 bytes # 0 Dir(s) 29,281,538,048 bytes free # [1] 0 Increasing the path length limits [*] doesn't help, since it's the filename length limit that we're bumping against. While both WIN32_FIND_DATAA and WIN32_FIND_DATAW contain fixed-size buffers, a valid filename may take more than MAX_PATH bytes to represent in UTF-8 while still being under the limit of MAX_PATH wide characters. This may mean having to rewrite list_files in terms of R_wopendir()/R_wreaddir() for Windows. As a workaround, we may use the short filename (which sometimes may not exist, alas) when FindNextFile() fails with ERROR_MORE_DATA. -- Best regards, Ivan [*] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/maximum-file-path-limitation
Tomas Kalibera
2023-Aug-15 06:38 UTC
[Rd] R-4.3 version list.files function could not work correctly in chinese
On 8/13/23 13:16, Ivan Krylov wrote:> Found it! Looks like a buffer length problem. This isn't limited to > Chinese, just more likely to happen when a character takes three bytes > to represent in UTF-8. (Any filename containing characters which take > more than one byte to represent in UTF-8 may fail.) > > If a directory contains a file with a sufficiently long name, > FindNextFile() fails with ERROR_MORE_DATA (0xEA, 234), making > R_readdir() return NULL, stopping list_files() prematurely: > > # everything seems to work fine... > > list.files("????") > # [1] "????-non-utf8-????? > ????????????????????????????????????????????????????.txt" > # [2] "????-non-utf8-?????.txt" > # [3] "????-utf-8.txt" > > # now create a file with an even longer name > > list.files("????") > # [1] "????-non-utf8-????? > ????????????????????????????????????????????????????.txt" > > # the files are still there, but not visible to list.files():Thanks, Ivan, could you please turn this into a complete minimal reproducible example, ideally with only ASCII characters (if enough to trigger)? Or any reproducible example would do. I would have a look later today.> > system("cmd /c dir /s *.txt") > # Volume in drive C has no label. > # Volume Serial Number is A85A-AA74 > # > # Directory of C:\R\R-4.3.1\bin\x64\???? > # > # 08/12/2023 07:57 AM 22 ????-non-utf8-????? > ????????????????????????????????????????????????????.txt > # 08/12/2023 07:57 AM 22 ????-non-utf8-????? > ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????.txt > # 08/12/2023 07:57 AM 22 ????-non-utf8-?????.txt > # 08/12/2023 07:56 AM 18 ????-utf-8.txt > # 4 File(s) 84 bytes > # > # Total Files Listed: > # 4 File(s) 84 bytes > # 0 Dir(s) 29,281,538,048 bytes free > # [1] 0 > > Increasing the path length limits [*] doesn't help, since it's the > filename length limit that we're bumping against. While both > WIN32_FIND_DATAA and WIN32_FIND_DATAW contain fixed-size buffers, a > valid filename may take more than MAX_PATH bytes to represent in UTF-8 > while still being under the limit of MAX_PATH wide characters. This may > mean having to rewrite list_files in terms of R_wopendir()/R_wreaddir() > for Windows. As a workaround, we may use the short filename (which > sometimes may not exist, alas) when FindNextFile() fails with > ERROR_MORE_DATA.I admit I didn't get your analysis. However, I've rewritten this code for R 4.3 to support long paths (when enabled in the system), more in https://blog.r-project.org/2023/03/07/path-length-limit-on-windows/index.html. As this was reported to be regression in 4.3, it is entirely possible this change came with a regression (though a bit surprising we didn't catch it earlier by testing), so it would be a great help if I could have the example and debug it. Thanks, Tomas