Ravi Varadhan
2019-May-06 14:06 UTC
[Rd] R optim(method="L-BFGS-B"): unexpected behavior when working with parent environments
Optim's Nelder-Mead works correctly for this example.> optim(par=10, fn=fn, method="Nelder-Mead")x=10, ret=100.02 (memory) x=11, ret=121 (calculate) x=9, ret=81 (calculate) x=8, ret=64 (calculate) x=6, ret=36 (calculate) x=4, ret=16 (calculate) x=0, ret=0 (calculate) x=-4, ret=16 (calculate) x=-4, ret=16 (memory) x=2, ret=4 (calculate) x=-2, ret=4 (calculate) x=1, ret=1 (calculate) x=-1, ret=1 (calculate) x=0.5, ret=0.25 (calculate) x=-0.5, ret=0.25 (calculate) x=0.25, ret=0.0625 (calculate) x=-0.25, ret=0.0625 (calculate) x=0.125, ret=0.015625 (calculate) x=-0.125, ret=0.015625 (calculate) x=0.0625, ret=0.00390625 (calculate) x=-0.0625, ret=0.00390625 (calculate) x=0.03125, ret=0.0009765625 (calculate) x=-0.03125, ret=0.0009765625 (calculate) x=0.015625, ret=0.0002441406 (calculate) x=-0.015625, ret=0.0002441406 (calculate) x=0.0078125, ret=6.103516e-05 (calculate) x=-0.0078125, ret=6.103516e-05 (calculate) x=0.00390625, ret=1.525879e-05 (calculate) x=-0.00390625, ret=1.525879e-05 (calculate) x=0.001953125, ret=3.814697e-06 (calculate) x=-0.001953125, ret=3.814697e-06 (calculate) x=0.0009765625, ret=9.536743e-07 (calculate) $par [1] 0 $value [1] 0 $counts function gradient 32 NA $convergence [1] 0 $message NULL ________________________________ From: R-devel <r-devel-bounces at r-project.org> on behalf of Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> Sent: Friday, May 3, 2019 8:18:44 AM To: peter dalgaard Cc: Florian Gerber; r-devel at r-project.org Subject: Re: [Rd] R optim(method="L-BFGS-B"): unexpected behavior when working with parent environments It looks as though this happens when calculating numerical gradients: x is reduced by eps, and fn is called; then x is increased by eps, and fn is called again. No check is made that x has other references after the first call to fn. I'll put together a patch if nobody else gets there first... Duncan Murdoch On 03/05/2019 7:13 a.m., peter dalgaard wrote:> Yes, I think you are right. I was at first confused by the fact that after the optim() call, > >> environment(fn)$xx > [1] 10 >> environment(fn)$ret > [1] 100.02 > > so not 9.999, but this could come from x being assigned the final value without calling fn. > > -pd > > >> On 3 May 2019, at 11:58 , Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Your results below make it look like a bug in optim(): it is not duplicating a value when it should, so changes to x affect xx as well. >> >> Duncan Murdoch >> >> On 03/05/2019 4:41 a.m., Serguei Sokol wrote: >>> On 03/05/2019 10:31, Serguei Sokol wrote: >>>> On 02/05/2019 21:35, Florian Gerber wrote: >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> when using optim() for a function that uses the parent environment, I >>>>> see the following unexpected behavior: >>>>> >>>>> makeFn <- function(){ >>>>> xx <- ret <- NA >>>>> fn <- function(x){ >>>>> if(!is.na(xx) && x==xx){ >>>>> cat("x=", xx, ", ret=", ret, " (memory)", fill=TRUE, sep="") >>>>> return(ret) >>>>> } >>>>> xx <<- x; ret <<- sum(x^2) >>>>> cat("x=", xx, ", ret=", ret, " (calculate)", fill=TRUE, sep="") >>>>> ret >>>>> } >>>>> fn >>>>> } >>>>> fn <- makeFn() >>>>> optim(par=10, fn=fn, method="L-BFGS-B") >>>>> # x=10, ret=100 (calculate) >>>>> # x=10.001, ret=100.02 (calculate) >>>>> # x=9.999, ret=100.02 (memory) >>>>> # $par >>>>> # [1] 10 >>>>> # >>>>> # $value >>>>> # [1] 100 >>>>> # (...) >>>>> >>>>> I would expect that optim() does more than 3 function evaluations and >>>>> that the optimization converges to 0. >>>>> >>>>> Same problem with optim(par=10, fn=fn, method="BFGS"). >>>>> >>>>> Any ideas? >>>> I don't have an answer but may be an insight. For some mysterious >>>> reason xx is getting changed when in should not. Consider: >>>>> fn=local({n=0; xx=ret=NA; function(x) {n <<- n+1; cat(n, "in >>>> x,xx,ret=", x, xx, ret, "\n"); if (!is.na(xx) && x==xx) ret else {xx >>>> <<- x; ret <<- x**2; cat("out x,xx,ret=", x, xx, ret, "\n"); ret}}}) >>>>> optim(par=10, fn=fn, method="L-BFGS-B") >>>> 1 in x,xx,ret= 10 NA NA >>>> out x,xx,ret= 10 10 100 >>>> 2 in x,xx,ret= 10.001 10 100 >>>> out x,xx,ret= 10.001 10.001 100.02 >>>> 3 in x,xx,ret= 9.999 9.999 100.02 >>>> $par >>>> [1] 10 >>>> >>>> $value >>>> [1] 100 >>>> >>>> $counts >>>> function gradient >>>> 1 1 >>>> >>>> $convergence >>>> [1] 0 >>>> >>>> $message >>>> [1] "CONVERGENCE: NORM OF PROJECTED GRADIENT <= PGTOL" >>>> >>>> At the third call, xx has value 9.999 while it should have kept the >>>> value 10.001. >>>> >>> A little follow-up: if you untie the link between xx and x by replacing >>> the expression "xx <<- x" by "xx <<- x+0" it works as expected: >>> > fn=local({n=0; xx=ret=NA; function(x) {n <<- n+1; cat(n, "in >>> x,xx,ret=", x, xx, ret, "\n"); if (!is.na(xx) && x==xx) ret else {xx <<- >>> x+0; ret <<- x**2; cat("out x,xx,ret=", x, xx, ret, "\n"); ret}}}) >>> > optim(par=10, fn=fn, method="L-BFGS-B") >>> 1 in x,xx,ret= 10 NA NA >>> out x,xx,ret= 10 10 100 >>> 2 in x,xx,ret= 10.001 10 100 >>> out x,xx,ret= 10.001 10.001 100.02 >>> 3 in x,xx,ret= 9.999 10.001 100.02 >>> out x,xx,ret= 9.999 9.999 99.98 >>> 4 in x,xx,ret= 9 9.999 99.98 >>> out x,xx,ret= 9 9 81 >>> 5 in x,xx,ret= 9.001 9 81 >>> out x,xx,ret= 9.001 9.001 81.018 >>> 6 in x,xx,ret= 8.999 9.001 81.018 >>> out x,xx,ret= 8.999 8.999 80.982 >>> 7 in x,xx,ret= 1.776357e-11 8.999 80.982 >>> out x,xx,ret= 1.776357e-11 1.776357e-11 3.155444e-22 >>> 8 in x,xx,ret= 0.001 1.776357e-11 3.155444e-22 >>> out x,xx,ret= 0.001 0.001 1e-06 >>> 9 in x,xx,ret= -0.001 0.001 1e-06 >>> out x,xx,ret= -0.001 -0.001 1e-06 >>> 10 in x,xx,ret= -1.334475e-23 -0.001 1e-06 >>> out x,xx,ret= -1.334475e-23 -1.334475e-23 1.780823e-46 >>> 11 in x,xx,ret= 0.001 -1.334475e-23 1.780823e-46 >>> out x,xx,ret= 0.001 0.001 1e-06 >>> 12 in x,xx,ret= -0.001 0.001 1e-06 >>> out x,xx,ret= -0.001 -0.001 1e-06 >>> $par >>> [1] -1.334475e-23 >>> $value >>> [1] 1.780823e-46 >>> $counts >>> function gradient >>> 4 4 >>> $convergence >>> [1] 0 >>> $message >>> [1] "CONVERGENCE: NORM OF PROJECTED GRADIENT <= PGTOL" >>> Serguei. >>> ______________________________________________ >>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >>> >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Ben Bolker
2019-May-06 14:40 UTC
[Rd] R optim(method="L-BFGS-B"): unexpected behavior when working with parent environments
That's consistent/not surprising if the problem lies in the numerical gradient calculation step ... On 2019-05-06 10:06 a.m., Ravi Varadhan wrote:> Optim's Nelder-Mead works correctly for this example. > > >> optim(par=10, fn=fn, method="Nelder-Mead") > x=10, ret=100.02 (memory) > x=11, ret=121 (calculate) > x=9, ret=81 (calculate) > x=8, ret=64 (calculate) > x=6, ret=36 (calculate) > x=4, ret=16 (calculate) > x=0, ret=0 (calculate) > x=-4, ret=16 (calculate) > x=-4, ret=16 (memory) > x=2, ret=4 (calculate) > x=-2, ret=4 (calculate) > x=1, ret=1 (calculate) > x=-1, ret=1 (calculate) > x=0.5, ret=0.25 (calculate) > x=-0.5, ret=0.25 (calculate) > x=0.25, ret=0.0625 (calculate) > x=-0.25, ret=0.0625 (calculate) > x=0.125, ret=0.015625 (calculate) > x=-0.125, ret=0.015625 (calculate) > x=0.0625, ret=0.00390625 (calculate) > x=-0.0625, ret=0.00390625 (calculate) > x=0.03125, ret=0.0009765625 (calculate) > x=-0.03125, ret=0.0009765625 (calculate) > x=0.015625, ret=0.0002441406 (calculate) > x=-0.015625, ret=0.0002441406 (calculate) > x=0.0078125, ret=6.103516e-05 (calculate) > x=-0.0078125, ret=6.103516e-05 (calculate) > x=0.00390625, ret=1.525879e-05 (calculate) > x=-0.00390625, ret=1.525879e-05 (calculate) > x=0.001953125, ret=3.814697e-06 (calculate) > x=-0.001953125, ret=3.814697e-06 (calculate) > x=0.0009765625, ret=9.536743e-07 (calculate) > $par > [1] 0 > > $value > [1] 0 > > $counts > function gradient > 32 NA > > $convergence > [1] 0 > > $message > NULL > > > > > ________________________________ > From: R-devel <r-devel-bounces at r-project.org> on behalf of Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> > Sent: Friday, May 3, 2019 8:18:44 AM > To: peter dalgaard > Cc: Florian Gerber; r-devel at r-project.org > Subject: Re: [Rd] R optim(method="L-BFGS-B"): unexpected behavior when working with parent environments > > > It looks as though this happens when calculating numerical gradients: x > is reduced by eps, and fn is called; then x is increased by eps, and fn > is called again. No check is made that x has other references after the > first call to fn. > > I'll put together a patch if nobody else gets there first... > > Duncan Murdoch > > On 03/05/2019 7:13 a.m., peter dalgaard wrote: >> Yes, I think you are right. I was at first confused by the fact that after the optim() call, >> >>> environment(fn)$xx >> [1] 10 >>> environment(fn)$ret >> [1] 100.02 >> >> so not 9.999, but this could come from x being assigned the final value without calling fn. >> >> -pd >> >> >>> On 3 May 2019, at 11:58 , Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Your results below make it look like a bug in optim(): it is not duplicating a value when it should, so changes to x affect xx as well. >>> >>> Duncan Murdoch >>> >>> On 03/05/2019 4:41 a.m., Serguei Sokol wrote: >>>> On 03/05/2019 10:31, Serguei Sokol wrote: >>>>> On 02/05/2019 21:35, Florian Gerber wrote: >>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>> >>>>>> when using optim() for a function that uses the parent environment, I >>>>>> see the following unexpected behavior: >>>>>> >>>>>> makeFn <- function(){ >>>>>> xx <- ret <- NA >>>>>> fn <- function(x){ >>>>>> if(!is.na(xx) && x==xx){ >>>>>> cat("x=", xx, ", ret=", ret, " (memory)", fill=TRUE, sep="") >>>>>> return(ret) >>>>>> } >>>>>> xx <<- x; ret <<- sum(x^2) >>>>>> cat("x=", xx, ", ret=", ret, " (calculate)", fill=TRUE, sep="") >>>>>> ret >>>>>> } >>>>>> fn >>>>>> } >>>>>> fn <- makeFn() >>>>>> optim(par=10, fn=fn, method="L-BFGS-B") >>>>>> # x=10, ret=100 (calculate) >>>>>> # x=10.001, ret=100.02 (calculate) >>>>>> # x=9.999, ret=100.02 (memory) >>>>>> # $par >>>>>> # [1] 10 >>>>>> # >>>>>> # $value >>>>>> # [1] 100 >>>>>> # (...) >>>>>> >>>>>> I would expect that optim() does more than 3 function evaluations and >>>>>> that the optimization converges to 0. >>>>>> >>>>>> Same problem with optim(par=10, fn=fn, method="BFGS"). >>>>>> >>>>>> Any ideas? >>>>> I don't have an answer but may be an insight. For some mysterious >>>>> reason xx is getting changed when in should not. Consider: >>>>>> fn=local({n=0; xx=ret=NA; function(x) {n <<- n+1; cat(n, "in >>>>> x,xx,ret=", x, xx, ret, "\n"); if (!is.na(xx) && x==xx) ret else {xx >>>>> <<- x; ret <<- x**2; cat("out x,xx,ret=", x, xx, ret, "\n"); ret}}}) >>>>>> optim(par=10, fn=fn, method="L-BFGS-B") >>>>> 1 in x,xx,ret= 10 NA NA >>>>> out x,xx,ret= 10 10 100 >>>>> 2 in x,xx,ret= 10.001 10 100 >>>>> out x,xx,ret= 10.001 10.001 100.02 >>>>> 3 in x,xx,ret= 9.999 9.999 100.02 >>>>> $par >>>>> [1] 10 >>>>> >>>>> $value >>>>> [1] 100 >>>>> >>>>> $counts >>>>> function gradient >>>>> 1 1 >>>>> >>>>> $convergence >>>>> [1] 0 >>>>> >>>>> $message >>>>> [1] "CONVERGENCE: NORM OF PROJECTED GRADIENT <= PGTOL" >>>>> >>>>> At the third call, xx has value 9.999 while it should have kept the >>>>> value 10.001. >>>>> >>>> A little follow-up: if you untie the link between xx and x by replacing >>>> the expression "xx <<- x" by "xx <<- x+0" it works as expected: >>>> > fn=local({n=0; xx=ret=NA; function(x) {n <<- n+1; cat(n, "in >>>> x,xx,ret=", x, xx, ret, "\n"); if (!is.na(xx) && x==xx) ret else {xx <<- >>>> x+0; ret <<- x**2; cat("out x,xx,ret=", x, xx, ret, "\n"); ret}}}) >>>> > optim(par=10, fn=fn, method="L-BFGS-B") >>>> 1 in x,xx,ret= 10 NA NA >>>> out x,xx,ret= 10 10 100 >>>> 2 in x,xx,ret= 10.001 10 100 >>>> out x,xx,ret= 10.001 10.001 100.02 >>>> 3 in x,xx,ret= 9.999 10.001 100.02 >>>> out x,xx,ret= 9.999 9.999 99.98 >>>> 4 in x,xx,ret= 9 9.999 99.98 >>>> out x,xx,ret= 9 9 81 >>>> 5 in x,xx,ret= 9.001 9 81 >>>> out x,xx,ret= 9.001 9.001 81.018 >>>> 6 in x,xx,ret= 8.999 9.001 81.018 >>>> out x,xx,ret= 8.999 8.999 80.982 >>>> 7 in x,xx,ret= 1.776357e-11 8.999 80.982 >>>> out x,xx,ret= 1.776357e-11 1.776357e-11 3.155444e-22 >>>> 8 in x,xx,ret= 0.001 1.776357e-11 3.155444e-22 >>>> out x,xx,ret= 0.001 0.001 1e-06 >>>> 9 in x,xx,ret= -0.001 0.001 1e-06 >>>> out x,xx,ret= -0.001 -0.001 1e-06 >>>> 10 in x,xx,ret= -1.334475e-23 -0.001 1e-06 >>>> out x,xx,ret= -1.334475e-23 -1.334475e-23 1.780823e-46 >>>> 11 in x,xx,ret= 0.001 -1.334475e-23 1.780823e-46 >>>> out x,xx,ret= 0.001 0.001 1e-06 >>>> 12 in x,xx,ret= -0.001 0.001 1e-06 >>>> out x,xx,ret= -0.001 -0.001 1e-06 >>>> $par >>>> [1] -1.334475e-23 >>>> $value >>>> [1] 1.780823e-46 >>>> $counts >>>> function gradient >>>> 4 4 >>>> $convergence >>>> [1] 0 >>>> $message >>>> [1] "CONVERGENCE: NORM OF PROJECTED GRADIENT <= PGTOL" >>>> Serguei. >>>> ______________________________________________ >>>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >>>> >>> >>> ______________________________________________ >>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >> > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >
Thomas Petzoldt
2019-May-06 16:21 UTC
[Rd] R optim(method="L-BFGS-B"): unexpected behavior when working with parent environments
It seems that it's an old bug that was found in some other packages, but at that time not optim: https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15958 and that Duncan Murdoch posted a patch already last Friday :) Thomas Am 06.05.2019 um 16:40 schrieb Ben Bolker:> That's consistent/not surprising if the problem lies in the numerical > gradient calculation step ... > > On 2019-05-06 10:06 a.m., Ravi Varadhan wrote: >> Optim's Nelder-Mead works correctly for this example. >> >> >>> optim(par=10, fn=fn, method="Nelder-Mead") >> x=10, ret=100.02 (memory) >> x=11, ret=121 (calculate) >> x=9, ret=81 (calculate) >> x=8, ret=64 (calculate) >> x=6, ret=36 (calculate) >> x=4, ret=16 (calculate) >> x=0, ret=0 (calculate) >> x=-4, ret=16 (calculate) >> x=-4, ret=16 (memory) >> x=2, ret=4 (calculate) >> x=-2, ret=4 (calculate) >> x=1, ret=1 (calculate) >> x=-1, ret=1 (calculate) >> x=0.5, ret=0.25 (calculate) >> x=-0.5, ret=0.25 (calculate) >> x=0.25, ret=0.0625 (calculate) >> x=-0.25, ret=0.0625 (calculate) >> x=0.125, ret=0.015625 (calculate) >> x=-0.125, ret=0.015625 (calculate) >> x=0.0625, ret=0.00390625 (calculate) >> x=-0.0625, ret=0.00390625 (calculate) >> x=0.03125, ret=0.0009765625 (calculate) >> x=-0.03125, ret=0.0009765625 (calculate) >> x=0.015625, ret=0.0002441406 (calculate) >> x=-0.015625, ret=0.0002441406 (calculate) >> x=0.0078125, ret=6.103516e-05 (calculate) >> x=-0.0078125, ret=6.103516e-05 (calculate) >> x=0.00390625, ret=1.525879e-05 (calculate) >> x=-0.00390625, ret=1.525879e-05 (calculate) >> x=0.001953125, ret=3.814697e-06 (calculate) >> x=-0.001953125, ret=3.814697e-06 (calculate) >> x=0.0009765625, ret=9.536743e-07 (calculate) >> $par >> [1] 0 >> >> $value >> [1] 0 >> >> $counts >> function gradient >> 32 NA >> >> $convergence >> [1] 0 >> >> $message >> NULL >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: R-devel <r-devel-bounces at r-project.org> on behalf of Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> >> Sent: Friday, May 3, 2019 8:18:44 AM >> To: peter dalgaard >> Cc: Florian Gerber; r-devel at r-project.org >> Subject: Re: [Rd] R optim(method="L-BFGS-B"): unexpected behavior when working with parent environments >> >> >> It looks as though this happens when calculating numerical gradients: x >> is reduced by eps, and fn is called; then x is increased by eps, and fn >> is called again. No check is made that x has other references after the >> first call to fn. >> >> I'll put together a patch if nobody else gets there first... >> >> Duncan Murdoch >> >> On 03/05/2019 7:13 a.m., peter dalgaard wrote: >>> Yes, I think you are right. I was at first confused by the fact that after the optim() call, >>> >>>> environment(fn)$xx >>> [1] 10 >>>> environment(fn)$ret >>> [1] 100.02 >>> >>> so not 9.999, but this could come from x being assigned the final value without calling fn. >>> >>> -pd >>> >>> >>>> On 3 May 2019, at 11:58 , Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Your results below make it look like a bug in optim(): it is not duplicating a value when it should, so changes to x affect xx as well. >>>> >>>> Duncan Murdoch >>>> >>>> On 03/05/2019 4:41 a.m., Serguei Sokol wrote: >>>>> On 03/05/2019 10:31, Serguei Sokol wrote: >>>>>> On 02/05/2019 21:35, Florian Gerber wrote: >>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> when using optim() for a function that uses the parent environment, I >>>>>>> see the following unexpected behavior: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> makeFn <- function(){ >>>>>>> xx <- ret <- NA >>>>>>> fn <- function(x){ >>>>>>> if(!is.na(xx) && x==xx){ >>>>>>> cat("x=", xx, ", ret=", ret, " (memory)", fill=TRUE, sep="") >>>>>>> return(ret) >>>>>>> } >>>>>>> xx <<- x; ret <<- sum(x^2) >>>>>>> cat("x=", xx, ", ret=", ret, " (calculate)", fill=TRUE, sep="") >>>>>>> ret >>>>>>> } >>>>>>> fn >>>>>>> } >>>>>>> fn <- makeFn() >>>>>>> optim(par=10, fn=fn, method="L-BFGS-B") >>>>>>> # x=10, ret=100 (calculate) >>>>>>> # x=10.001, ret=100.02 (calculate) >>>>>>> # x=9.999, ret=100.02 (memory) >>>>>>> # $par >>>>>>> # [1] 10 >>>>>>> # >>>>>>> # $value >>>>>>> # [1] 100 >>>>>>> # (...) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would expect that optim() does more than 3 function evaluations and >>>>>>> that the optimization converges to 0. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Same problem with optim(par=10, fn=fn, method="BFGS"). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any ideas? >>>>>> I don't have an answer but may be an insight. For some mysterious >>>>>> reason xx is getting changed when in should not. Consider: >>>>>>> fn=local({n=0; xx=ret=NA; function(x) {n <<- n+1; cat(n, "in >>>>>> x,xx,ret=", x, xx, ret, "\n"); if (!is.na(xx) && x==xx) ret else {xx >>>>>> <<- x; ret <<- x**2; cat("out x,xx,ret=", x, xx, ret, "\n"); ret}}}) >>>>>>> optim(par=10, fn=fn, method="L-BFGS-B") >>>>>> 1 in x,xx,ret= 10 NA NA >>>>>> out x,xx,ret= 10 10 100 >>>>>> 2 in x,xx,ret= 10.001 10 100 >>>>>> out x,xx,ret= 10.001 10.001 100.02 >>>>>> 3 in x,xx,ret= 9.999 9.999 100.02 >>>>>> $par >>>>>> [1] 10 >>>>>> >>>>>> $value >>>>>> [1] 100 >>>>>> >>>>>> $counts >>>>>> function gradient >>>>>> 1 1 >>>>>> >>>>>> $convergence >>>>>> [1] 0 >>>>>> >>>>>> $message >>>>>> [1] "CONVERGENCE: NORM OF PROJECTED GRADIENT <= PGTOL" >>>>>> >>>>>> At the third call, xx has value 9.999 while it should have kept the >>>>>> value 10.001. >>>>>> >>>>> A little follow-up: if you untie the link between xx and x by replacing >>>>> the expression "xx <<- x" by "xx <<- x+0" it works as expected: >>>>> > fn=local({n=0; xx=ret=NA; function(x) {n <<- n+1; cat(n, "in >>>>> x,xx,ret=", x, xx, ret, "\n"); if (!is.na(xx) && x==xx) ret else {xx <<- >>>>> x+0; ret <<- x**2; cat("out x,xx,ret=", x, xx, ret, "\n"); ret}}}) >>>>> > optim(par=10, fn=fn, method="L-BFGS-B") >>>>> 1 in x,xx,ret= 10 NA NA >>>>> out x,xx,ret= 10 10 100 >>>>> 2 in x,xx,ret= 10.001 10 100 >>>>> out x,xx,ret= 10.001 10.001 100.02 >>>>> 3 in x,xx,ret= 9.999 10.001 100.02 >>>>> out x,xx,ret= 9.999 9.999 99.98 >>>>> 4 in x,xx,ret= 9 9.999 99.98 >>>>> out x,xx,ret= 9 9 81 >>>>> 5 in x,xx,ret= 9.001 9 81 >>>>> out x,xx,ret= 9.001 9.001 81.018 >>>>> 6 in x,xx,ret= 8.999 9.001 81.018 >>>>> out x,xx,ret= 8.999 8.999 80.982 >>>>> 7 in x,xx,ret= 1.776357e-11 8.999 80.982 >>>>> out x,xx,ret= 1.776357e-11 1.776357e-11 3.155444e-22 >>>>> 8 in x,xx,ret= 0.001 1.776357e-11 3.155444e-22 >>>>> out x,xx,ret= 0.001 0.001 1e-06 >>>>> 9 in x,xx,ret= -0.001 0.001 1e-06 >>>>> out x,xx,ret= -0.001 -0.001 1e-06 >>>>> 10 in x,xx,ret= -1.334475e-23 -0.001 1e-06 >>>>> out x,xx,ret= -1.334475e-23 -1.334475e-23 1.780823e-46 >>>>> 11 in x,xx,ret= 0.001 -1.334475e-23 1.780823e-46 >>>>> out x,xx,ret= 0.001 0.001 1e-06 >>>>> 12 in x,xx,ret= -0.001 0.001 1e-06 >>>>> out x,xx,ret= -0.001 -0.001 1e-06 >>>>> $par >>>>> [1] -1.334475e-23 >>>>> $value >>>>> [1] 1.780823e-46 >>>>> $counts >>>>> function gradient >>>>> 4 4 >>>>> $convergence >>>>> [1] 0 >>>>> $message >>>>> [1] "CONVERGENCE: NORM OF PROJECTED GRADIENT <= PGTOL" >>>>> Serguei. >>>>> ______________________________________________ >>>>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >>>>> >>>> ______________________________________________ >>>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >> ______________________________________________ >> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >> >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >> > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Apparently Analagous Threads
- R optim(method="L-BFGS-B"): unexpected behavior when working with parent environments
- R optim(method="L-BFGS-B"): unexpected behavior when working with parent environments
- R optim(method="L-BFGS-B"): unexpected behavior when working with parent environments
- R optim(method="L-BFGS-B"): unexpected behavior when working with parent environments
- R optim(method="L-BFGS-B"): unexpected behavior when working with parent environments