Jim, yes, I have dealt with that particular challenge that list(...)
throws an error for a call like f(x,,,) where the empty args match to a
... formal argument. Here's some fragments of code that I used to cope
with this:
# to find the empty anon args, must work with the unevaluated dot args
dot.args.uneval <- match.call(expand.dots=FALSE)$...
if (length(dot.args.uneval))
missing.dot.args <- sapply(dot.args.uneval, function(arg)
is.symbol(arg) && as.character(arg)=="")
else
missing.dot.args <- logical(0)
...
# Now we can work with evaluated dot args.
# Can't do dot.args <- list(...) because that will
# stop with an error for missing args.
dot.args <- mapply(dot.args.uneval, missing.dot.args,
FUN=function(arg, m) if (!m) eval(arg) else NULL)
Let me know if you need any further explanation.
Several warnings:
* I was using this code with S3 generics and methods.
* There are quite possibly better ways of detecting empty unevaluated
arguments than 'is.symbol(arg) &&
as.character(arg)==""'.
* You'll probably want to be careful that the eval() in the last line is
using the appropriate environment for your application.
I didn't read your code in detail, so apologies if the above is
off-the-point, but your verbal description of the problem and the coding
style and comments in the "[" method for "myExample"
triggered my memory.
-- Tony Plate
On 05/17/2010 07:48 PM, James Bullard wrote:> Apologies if I am not understanding something about how things are being
> handled when using S4 methods, but I have been unable to find an answer to
> my problem for some time now.
>
> Briefly, I am associating the generic '[' with a class which I
wrote
> (here: myExample). The underlying back-end allows me to read contiguous
> slabs, e.g., 1:10, but not c(1, 10). I want to shield the user from this
> infelicity, so I grab the slab and then subset in memory. The main problem
> is with datasets with dim(.)> 2. In this case, the '...'
argument doesn't
> seem to be in a reasonable state. When it is indeed missing then it
> properly reports that fact, however, when it is not missing it reports
> that it is not missing, but then the call to: list(...) throws an argument
> is missing exception.
>
> I cannot imagine that this has not occurred before, so I am expecting
> someone might be able to point me to some example code. I have attached
> some code demonstrating my general problem ((A) and (B) below) as well as
> the outline of the sub-selection code. I have to say that coding this has
> proven non-trivial and any thoughts on cleaning up the mess are welcome.
>
> As always, thanks for the help.
>
> Jim
>
> require(methods)
>
> setClass('myExample', representation = representation(x =
"array"))
>
> myExample<- function(dims = c(1,2)) {
> a<- array(rnorm(prod(dims)))
> dim(a)<- dims
> obj<- new("myExample")
> obj at x<- a
> return(obj)
> }
>
> setMethod("dim", "myExample", function(x) return(dim(x
at x)))
>
> functionThatCanOnlyGrabContiguous<- function(x, m, kall) {
> kall$x<- x at x
> for (i in 1:nrow(m)) {
> kall[[i+2]]<- seq.int(m[i,1], m[i,2])
> }
> print(as.list(kall))
> return(eval(kall))
> }
>
> setMethod("[", "myExample", function(x, i, j, ..., drop
= TRUE) {
> if (missing(...)){
> print("Missing!")
> }
> e<- list(...)
> m<- matrix(nrow = length(dim(x)), ncol = 2)
>
> if (missing(i))
> m[1,]<- c(1, dim(x)[1])
> else
> m[1,]<- range(i)
>
> if (length(dim(x))> 1) {
> if (missing(j))
> m[2,]<- c(1, dim(x)[2])
> else
> m[2,]<- range(j)
>
> k<- 3
> while (k<= nrow(m)) {
> if (k-2<= length(e))
> m[k,]<- range(e[[k-2]])
> else
> m[k,]<- c(1, dim(x)[k])
> k<- k + 1
> }
> }
> kall<- match.call()
> d<- functionThatCanOnlyGrabContiguous(x, m, kall)
>
> kall$x<- d
> if (! missing(i)) {
> kall[[3]]<- i - min(i) + 1
> }
> if (! missing(j)) {
> kall[[4]]<- j - min(j) + 1
> } else {
> if (length(dim(x))> 1)
> kall[[4]]<- seq.int(1, dim(x)[2])
> }
> ## XXX: Have to handle remaining dimensions, but since I can't
> ## really get a clean '...' it is on hold.
>
> eval(kall)
> })
>
> ## ############### 1-D
> m<- myExample(10)
> m at x[c(1,5)] == m[c(1, 5)]
>
> ## ############### 2-D
> m<- myExample(c(10, 10))
> m at x[c(1,5), c(1,5)] == m[c(1,5), c(1,5)]
> m at x[c(5, 2),] == m[c(5,2),]
>
> ## ############### 3-D
> m<- myExample(c(1,3,4))
>
> ## (A) doesn't work
> m at x[1,1:2,] == m[1,1:2,]
>
> ## (B) nor does this for different reasons.
> m[1,,1]
> m at x[1,,1]
>
>
>> sessionInfo()
>>
> R version 2.11.0 (2010-04-22)
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
>
> locale:
> [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C
> [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8
> [5] LC_MONETARY=C LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
> [7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NAME=C
> [9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C
> [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
>
> attached base packages:
> [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
>
> loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
> [1] tools_2.11.0
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
>
>