On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 jhallman@frb.gov wrote:
> Is there a way to overload the ":" operator? I have a class
called
> "ti", but I found that
>
> firstTi:secondTi
>
> does not dispatch to either Ops.ti nor to ":.ti" if I define
that. Am I
> just out of luck?
Well, it is not in the Ops group, so what made you think it would work?
If you mean S3 methods, then ":" is not an S3 generic. If it were, it
would be documented.
--
Brian D. Ripley, ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595