Dear R-Developers I have a question regarding the license of Mathlib: Is the license GPL or LGPL? I am confused, since the file "nmath.h" mentions GPL in the header, while the file "Rmath.h0.in" mentions LGPL in the header. Best regards Christian _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._ C.h.i.s.t.i.a.n S.t.r.a.t.o.w.a V.i.e.n.n.a A.u.s.t.r.i.a _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, cstrato wrote:> Dear R-Developers > > I have a question regarding the license of Mathlib: > Is the license GPL or LGPL? > > I am confused, since the file "nmath.h" mentions GPL in the header, > while the file "Rmath.h0.in" mentions LGPL in the header.More importantly, the C code of the functions is under GPL. It is only the public header files (and nmath.h is private) that have LGPL in them. See the file COPYRIGHTS (which you seem not to be aware of). -- Brian D. Ripley, ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
Dear Prof Ripley Thank you for this clarification. Best regards Christian Stratowa Prof Brian D Ripley wrote:> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, cstrato wrote: > > >>Dear R-Developers >> >>I have a question regarding the license of Mathlib: >>Is the license GPL or LGPL? >> >>I am confused, since the file "nmath.h" mentions GPL in the header, >>while the file "Rmath.h0.in" mentions LGPL in the header. > > > More importantly, the C code of the functions is under GPL. > It is only the public header files (and nmath.h is private) that have LGPL > in them. See the file COPYRIGHTS (which you seem not to be aware of). >