>>>>> "JonR" == Jonathan Rougier
<J.C.Rougier@durham.ac.uk>
>>>>> on Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:49:53 +0100 writes:
JonR> Hi everyone,
JonR> Can I suggest an addition to the help page for logical AND and OR,
JonR> indicating the behaviour of NA (which is currently not mentioned at
JonR> all). I think something simple like an extra paragraph in Details,
eg
JonR> \code{NA} is a valid logical object. Where a component of \code{x}
or
JonR> \code{y} is \code{NA}, the result will be \code{NA} if the outcome
is
JonR> ambiguous. In other words \code{NA & TRUE} evaluates to
\code{NA}, but
JonR> \code{NA & FALSE} evaluates to \code{FALSE}. See the examples
below.
JonR> And so it might also be a good idea to add a truth-table to the
JonR> examples, eg
JonR> # construct truth table for logical &
JonR> x <- c(NA, FALSE, TRUE)
JonR> names(x) <- as.character(x)
JonR> outer(x, x, "&")
Thanks a lot, Jonathan, for the helpful suggestions.
I'm adding these to R-devel.
Martin
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To:
r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._