Full_Name: Hao Yu Version: 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 OS: Redhat 7 Linux (intel) Submission from: (NULL) (129.100.45.161) Hi, I am not sure this is well know problem but I could not find anyone mention it. The problem is related to build R on redhat 7. After got src.rpm and tried to rebuild it, it failed on testing accuracy. Further it shows that under R, .Machine gives some numbers that maybe are not correct. I also tried the most recent one (November 6) and failed. The strange thing is that the R (1.1.0) that comes with powertools of redhat 7 has exactly the same problem. All three R gives the same results for .Machine. See the following outputs. Thanks Hao Yu PS. One system has Pentium III 600Mhz and 256RDRAM, Intel CC820 motherboard; Another has Pentium III 800Mhz and 256 SDRAM, ASUS BX motherboard. ***************************************************************************** R : Copyright 2000, The R Development Core Team Version 1.1.1 Patched (November 6, 2000) R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type "?license" or "?licence" for distribution details. R is a collaborative project with many contributors. Type "?contributors" for a list. Type "demo()" for some demos, "help()" for on-line help, or "help.start()" for a HTML browser interface to help. Type "q()" to quit R.> .Machine$double.eps [1] 1.084202e-19 $double.neg.eps [1] 5.421011e-20 $double.xmin [1] 0.25 $double.xmax [1] 0.5 $double.base [1] 2 $double.digits [1] 64 $double.rounding [1] 5 $double.guard [1] 0 $double.ulp.digits [1] -63 $double.neg.ulp.digits [1] -64 $double.exponent [1] 1 $double.min.exp [1] -2 $double.max.exp [1] -2 $integer.max [1] 2147483647 -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
hyu@stats.uwo.ca writes:> Full_Name: Hao Yu > Version: 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 > OS: Redhat 7 Linux (intel) > Submission from: (NULL) (129.100.45.161) > > > Hi, I am not sure this is well know problem but I could not find anyone mention > it. > The problem is related to build R on redhat 7. After got src.rpm and tried to > rebuild it, it failed on testing accuracy. Further it shows that under R, > .Machine gives some numbers that maybe are not correct. I also tried the most > recent one (November 6) and failed. The strange thing is that the R (1.1.0) that > comes with powertools of redhat 7 has exactly the same problem. All three R > gives the same results for .Machine. See the following outputs.We (R-core + Martyn Plummer who builds the RPM files on CRAN) discussed this earlier today. It is a problem with the RedHat "unofficical 2.96" gcc compiler which seems to be overly zealous on some optimizations. The build is said to work if you build R unoptimized. We're strongly considering to say that R *requires* another gcc compiler rather than trying to work around bugs in a compiler that should never have been released. The powertools version appears to have been built by disabling the regression test (make check)! It might be worth filing a formal bug report with RedHat on that matter. (It is not merely a matter of cosmetics, those machine constants actually get used for determining convergence criteria and the like. Having them set too low could send algorithms into infinite loops.) I think Martyn Plummer is about to produce a working RPM based on a better compiler. However, if you want to compile add-on packages, it might still be a good idea to install an alternative compiler for yourself. -- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3 c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907 -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Matrix identification bug (PR#1361)
- R-beta: R has underflows on sparc-redhat-linux
- [RHSA-2000:005-05] New majordomo packages available
- CentOS 8: several packages have unresolved dependencies after "dnf update all "
- Missing packages in centos8 mirrors or do I miss something?