On Thu, 21 Sep 2000 aprasad@fs.fed.us wrote:
> Full_Name: Anantha Prasad
> Version: 1.1.1
> OS: Linux
> Submission from: (NULL) (199.131.134.57)
>
>
> When I try to use
> > options(width=201)
> Error in options(...) : invalid width parameter
> It looks like 200 is the max. limit. THis is a huge limitation...for if I
am
[...]
> This limitation is not there in S-PLUS where you can set the width to any
> number.
> Hope this is fixed soon as many scripts I use depend on me setting width
to> atleast
> 2000!
It's set as macro R_MAX_WIDTH_OPT in Print.h. All you needed to do is to
change that and re-compile. Simple, surely? Even simple things like this
take time to track down and deal with, so it would be appreciated if bug
reporters could contribute to the R project by doing as much as they can
themselves.
Presumably it is there to protect people from themselves, but as e.g.
strings can come out much longer I don't think it is very effective.
Alternatively as it dates from the era of fixed-size output buffers it
might have been to protect R, but that seems no longer necessary,
at least on a Unix console (it might be on other output devices).
I've upped the limit to 10000 and added comments in the help file and
a more informative warning:
> options(width=-17)
Error in options(...) : invalid width parameter, allowed 10...10000
--
Brian D. Ripley, ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272860 (secr)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To:
r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
