ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
2000-Sep-15 09:23 UTC
[Rd] identify.default ignores any setting of cex. (PR#660)
R 1.1.1 on Windows, but I think this is widespread. Using either par(cex=0.5) plot(1:10) identify(1:10) or plot(1:10) identify(1:10, cex=0.5) ignores the cex setting. The root cause is that par(cex=0.5) alters cexbase for the device but sets cex=1.0, and the internal text plotting routines use cex and not cexbase. The obvious fix is to set cex to cexbase in do_identify. However, if this is fixed, there is another problem, The offset of the label is related to the cex in use for the label, and not for the symbol. So plot(1:10, type="n") points(1:10, cex=5) identify(1:10) is not sensible in placing the labels. That may be hard to anticipate, but plot(1:10) identify(1:10, cex=0.5) needs to use cex=1 not cex=0.5 for the adjustment. Perhaps identify is trying too hard, and should give the user more control over the precise position of the label (as S-PLUS does). -- Brian D. Ripley, ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272860 (secr) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595 -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._