Paul Gilbert <pgilbert@bank-banque-canada.ca> writes:
> For some of my packages I am getting a segmentation fault in Linux when
> I use R CMD check. (Using R 1.0.1) The segmentation fault does not
> happen in Solaris and in some cases it does not happen in Linux if I set
> R_NSIZE and R_VSIZE much higher than I need in Solaris. Should I expect
> a segmentation fault if there is not enough memory for R CMD check, or
> are these unrelated?
It's certainly not the intention to give segfaults for that reason...
However, the same pattern could occur from PROTECT errors in your C
code, triggered by a garbage collection at just the wrong moment
(which could be different on different OSs).
You should rerun the relevant testscript under "R -d gdb" and see
exactly where the segfault occurs.
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To:
r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._