Hmm ... It seems that as of 0.50.a1 we need to link against f2c because pow_dd is no longer provided (internally, POW_DD is used). I am not sure how much sense that really makes, but it would seem that getting the things from 0.49 f2clib.c back would be great ... -k =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Kurt Hornik writes: > Hmm ... It seems that as of 0.50.a1 we need to link against f2c because > pow_dd is no longer provided (internally, POW_DD is used). I am not > sure how much sense that really makes, but it would seem that getting > the things from 0.49 f2clib.c back would be great ... I was worried about name conflicts with systems which do not follow the f77/f2c standard. I will put these back the old way and make it possible to #define NONSTANDARD_F77LIBS or somesuch to get the new effect if it is needed. Ross =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-