philipp Hanselmann
2009-May-27 11:56 UTC
[Puppet Users] Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
May somebody has answer ...
How can I ensure that certain classes get executed on the client side
before the other ones do?
Have a look on the example:
class AA
case $operatingsystem {
"redhat": { include AA::do-first }
default: {}
}
include AA::software
include AA::desktop
}
class AA::do-first {
# do an rhn_register
exec { "register-system":
command => "rm -f /etc/sysconfig/rhn/systemid ; rhnreg_ks
--force --serverUrl=https://$rhn_server/XMLRPC
--sslCACert=/usr/share/rhn/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT
--activationkey=$activation_key",
logoutput => true,
unless => "/usr/sbin/rhn_check",
tag => register-system,
}
}
class AA::software {
# do someting after AA::do-first
}
class AA::desktop {
# do something after AA::do-first
}
For an Redhat system the resource(s) in AA::do-first should run before
the resource(s) in AA::software & AA::desktop.
Is their an simple way for that?
An other wish would be: If Exec "register-system" fails, puppet should
stop his execution without do go through the class AA::software &
AA::desktop.
Thanks for the help!
Philipp
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Greg
2009-May-27 23:58 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects. Can''t do it at class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the system for this, because I''d like it as well... Greg On May 27, 9:56 pm, philipp Hanselmann <philipp.hanselm...@gmail.com> wrote:> May somebody has answer ... > > How can I ensure that certain classes get executed on the client side > before the other ones do? > > Have a look on the example: > > class AA > case $operatingsystem { > "redhat": { include AA::do-first } > default: {} > } > include AA::software > include AA::desktop > } > > class AA::do-first { > # do an rhn_register > exec { "register-system": > command => "rm -f /etc/sysconfig/rhn/systemid ; rhnreg_ks > --force --serverUrl=https://$rhn_server/XMLRPC > --sslCACert=/usr/share/rhn/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT > --activationkey=$activation_key", > logoutput => true, > unless => "/usr/sbin/rhn_check", > tag => register-system, > } > > } > class AA::software { > # do someting after AA::do-first > } > class AA::desktop { > # do something after AA::do-first > } > > For an Redhat system the resource(s) in AA::do-first should run before > the resource(s) in AA::software & AA::desktop. > > Is their an simple way for that? > > An other wish would be: If Exec "register-system" fails, puppet should > stop his execution without do go through the class AA::software & > AA::desktop. > > Thanks for the help! > > Philipp--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Junhao
2009-May-28 00:17 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
Greg wrote:> Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects. > Can''t do it at > class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the > system for this, because > I''d like it as well... > > Greg > > On May 27, 9:56 pm, philipp Hanselmann <philipp.hanselm...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> May somebody has answer ... >> >> How can I ensure that certain classes get executed on the client side >> before the other ones do? >> >> Have a look on the example: >> >> class AA >> case $operatingsystem { >> "redhat": { include AA::do-first } >> default: {} >> } >> include AA::software >> include AA::desktop >> } >> >> class AA::do-first { >> # do an rhn_register >> exec { "register-system": >> command => "rm -f /etc/sysconfig/rhn/systemid ; rhnreg_ks >> --force --serverUrl=https://$rhn_server/XMLRPC >> --sslCACert=/usr/share/rhn/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT >> --activationkey=$activation_key", >> logoutput => true, >> unless => "/usr/sbin/rhn_check", >> tag => register-system, >> } >> >> } >> class AA::software { >> # do someting after AA::do-first >> } >> class AA::desktop { >> # do something after AA::do-first >> } >> >> For an Redhat system the resource(s) in AA::do-first should run before >> the resource(s) in AA::software & AA::desktop. >> >> Is their an simple way for that? >> >> An other wish would be: If Exec "register-system" fails, puppet should >> stop his execution without do go through the class AA::software & >> AA::desktop. >> >> Thanks for the help! >> >> PhilippWhat about: module AA: class AA {} class AA::do-first {} class AA::software inherits AA::do-first {} class AA::desktop inherits AA::do-first {} node foo: node foo { import "AA" include AA::desktop } Junhao --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Peter Meier
2009-May-28 09:55 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
Hi> Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects. > Can''t do it at > class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the > system for this, because > I''d like it as well...hmm did I only dream that in the upcoming release there will be a require (or something like that) keyword to include a class and require it. Unfortunately I''m not able to find the appropriate bug report. cheers pete --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Brice Figureau
2009-May-28 15:55 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:55 +0200, Peter Meier wrote:> Hi > > > Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects. > > Can''t do it at > > class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the > > system for this, because > > I''d like it as well... > > hmm did I only dream that in the upcoming release there will be a > require (or something like that) keyword to include a class and > require it. Unfortunately I''m not able to find the appropriate bug > report.I implemented it for sure, but in the end I think it was rejected: http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1907 Re-reading the thread I see why we rejected the bug, but not the patch. I think I''ll have to resubmit it. -- Brice Figureau My Blog: http://www.masterzen.fr/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Peter Meier
2009-May-28 16:00 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
Hi> I implemented it for sure, but in the end I think it was rejected: > http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1907 > > Re-reading the thread I see why we rejected the bug, but not the patch. > I think I''ll have to resubmit it.yeah I objected because of changing the behaviour of include. But I thought that it was implemented with a different keyword, which wouldn''t change the behaviour of include. Something like a "stronger" include and I thought it have been called required. But maybe I''m wrong. cheers pete --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Peter Meier
2009-May-28 16:02 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
Hi> yeah I objected because of changing the behaviour of include. But I > thought that it was implemented with a different keyword, which wouldn''t > change the behaviour of include. > > Something like a "stronger" include and I thought it have been called > required. > > But maybe I''m wrong.and rereading it with full concentration I see that it should be called reuqire. :) cheers pete --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
James Turnbull
2009-May-28 22:18 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
Brice Figureau wrote:> On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:55 +0200, Peter Meier wrote: >> Hi >> >>> Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects. >>> Can''t do it at >>> class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the >>> system for this, because >>> I''d like it as well... >> hmm did I only dream that in the upcoming release there will be a >> require (or something like that) keyword to include a class and >> require it. Unfortunately I''m not able to find the appropriate bug >> report. > > I implemented it for sure, but in the end I think it was rejected: > http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1907 > > Re-reading the thread I see why we rejected the bug, but not the patch. > I think I''ll have to resubmit it.Yes - had to go re-read myself. As long as we provide both functions - include and a stronger require - I think this is an easy +1. Regards James Turnbull -- Author of: * Pro Linux Systems Administration (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1430219122/) * Pulling Strings with Puppet (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590599780/) * Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590596099/) * Hardening Linux (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590594444/)
philipp Hanselmann
2009-May-29 06:49 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
Junhao schrieb:> Greg wrote: > >> Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects. >> Can''t do it at >> class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the >> system for this, because >> I''d like it as well... >> >> Greg >> >> On May 27, 9:56 pm, philipp Hanselmann <philipp.hanselm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> May somebody has answer ... >>> >>> How can I ensure that certain classes get executed on the client side >>> before the other ones do? >>> >>> Have a look on the example: >>> >>> class AA >>> case $operatingsystem { >>> "redhat": { include AA::do-first } >>> default: {} >>> } >>> include AA::software >>> include AA::desktop >>> } >>> >>> class AA::do-first { >>> # do an rhn_register >>> exec { "register-system": >>> command => "rm -f /etc/sysconfig/rhn/systemid ; rhnreg_ks >>> --force --serverUrl=https://$rhn_server/XMLRPC >>> --sslCACert=/usr/share/rhn/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT >>> --activationkey=$activation_key", >>> logoutput => true, >>> unless => "/usr/sbin/rhn_check", >>> tag => register-system, >>> } >>> >>> } >>> class AA::software { >>> # do someting after AA::do-first >>> } >>> class AA::desktop { >>> # do something after AA::do-first >>> } >>> >>> For an Redhat system the resource(s) in AA::do-first should run before >>> the resource(s) in AA::software & AA::desktop. >>> >>> Is their an simple way for that? >>> >>> An other wish would be: If Exec "register-system" fails, puppet should >>> stop his execution without do go through the class AA::software & >>> AA::desktop. >>> >>> Thanks for the help! >>> >>> Philipp >>> > > What about: > > module AA: > class AA {} > class AA::do-first {$myvariable> } > class AA::software inherits AA::do-first {} > class AA::desktop inherits AA::do-first {} > > node foo: > > node foo { > import "AA" > include AA::desktop > } > > Junhao > >Hi Janhao Even this works, I had issues with the scope of my global defined variables, so I decided to replace all my inherits code trough include(s). Since than puppet handle my variables like expected. So not really willing to go back. I must commit up to date I couldn''t understand the advances of using class inheritance comparing to include statements ... class master { # do something } class slave inherits master { # do something } OR class master { # do something } class slave { include master # do something } What are differences execpt to get issues with the variable scope in inheritanced classes? Philipp> > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
philipp Hanselmann
2009-May-29 07:00 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
James Turnbull schrieb:> Brice Figureau wrote: > >> On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:55 +0200, Peter Meier wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> >>>> Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects. >>>> Can''t do it at >>>> class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the >>>> system for this, because >>>> I''d like it as well... >>>> >>> hmm did I only dream that in the upcoming release there will be a >>> require (or something like that) keyword to include a class and >>> require it. Unfortunately I''m not able to find the appropriate bug >>> report. >>> >> I implemented it for sure, but in the end I think it was rejected: >> http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1907 >> >> Re-reading the thread I see why we rejected the bug, but not the patch. >> I think I''ll have to resubmit it. >> > > Yes - had to go re-read myself. As long as we provide both functions - > include and a stronger require - I think this is an easy +1. > > Regards > > James Turnbull > >Yes, that will be great when require for classes comes in. With this I can much more control, how puppet evaluates the configuration. Thanks! Philipp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Brice Figureau
2009-May-29 08:01 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 08:18 +1000, James Turnbull wrote:> Brice Figureau wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:55 +0200, Peter Meier wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >>> Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects. > >>> Can''t do it at > >>> class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the > >>> system for this, because > >>> I''d like it as well... > >> hmm did I only dream that in the upcoming release there will be a > >> require (or something like that) keyword to include a class and > >> require it. Unfortunately I''m not able to find the appropriate bug > >> report. > > > > I implemented it for sure, but in the end I think it was rejected: > > http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1907 > > > > Re-reading the thread I see why we rejected the bug, but not the patch. > > I think I''ll have to resubmit it. > > Yes - had to go re-read myself. As long as we provide both functions - > include and a stronger require - I think this is an easy +1.Yes, that''s what my patch was doing. I''ll resurrect the patch and post it to puppet-dev this week-end. -- Brice Figureau My Blog: http://www.masterzen.fr/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Rene
2009-Jun-11 21:12 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
Does anybody know the status of that patch? On May 29, 10:01 am, Brice Figureau <brice-pup...@daysofwonder.com> wrote:> On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 08:18 +1000, James Turnbull wrote: > > Brice Figureau wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:55 +0200, Peter Meier wrote: > > >> Hi > > > >>> Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects. > > >>> Can''t do it at > > >>> class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the > > >>> system for this, because > > >>> I''d like it as well... > > >> hmm did I only dream that in the upcoming release there will be a > > >> require (or something like that) keyword to include a class and > > >> require it. Unfortunately I''m not able to find the appropriate bug > > >> report. > > > > I implemented it for sure, but in the end I think it was rejected: > > >http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1907 > > > > Re-reading the thread I see why we rejected the bug, but not the patch. > > > I think I''ll have to resubmit it. > > > Yes - had to go re-read myself. As long as we provide both functions - > > include and a stronger require - I think this is an easy +1. > > Yes, that''s what my patch was doing. > I''ll resurrect the patch and post it to puppet-dev this week-end. > -- > Brice Figureau > My Blog:http://www.masterzen.fr/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
James Turnbull
2009-Jun-11 22:25 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: Controlling the order of execution of puppet code?
Rene wrote:> Does anybody know the status of that patch? >It''s pushed and will be in 0.25.0. The next 0.25.0 release will be beta2 but I haven''t got a date yet. Regards James Turnbull -- Author of: * Pro Linux Systems Administration (http://tinyurl.com/linuxadmin) * Pulling Strings with Puppet (http://tinyurl.com/pupbook) * Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://tinyurl.com/pronagios) * Hardening Linux (http://tinyurl.com/hardeninglinux)