Puppet users - Feb 2009 - Has anyone tried Puppet under Ruby 1.9?

The speed benefits of Ruby 1.9 are amazing overall and I was wondering
if Puppet, as it stands, is deliberately compatible.

I''ve tried digging through the mailing lists and might just be missing
it, if so, I apologize for the oversight.

Trevor

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

On Feb 12, 2009, at 4:43 AM, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
>
> The speed benefits of Ruby 1.9 are amazing overall and I was wondering
> if Puppet, as it stands, is deliberately compatible.
>
> I''ve tried digging through the mailing lists and might just be
missing
> it, if so, I apologize for the oversight.
josb has provided a 1.9 compatibility patch, but we stupidly have not  
merged it in yet.

It''ll be in 0.25, though.

-- 
Be wary of the man who urges an action in which he himself incurs no
risk. -- Joaquin Setanti
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Awesome. Thanks Luke.

Can''t wait to see how the performance stacks up.

Trevor

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 22:43, Luke Kanies <luke@madstop.com>
wrote:
>
> On Feb 12, 2009, at 4:43 AM, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
>
>>
>> The speed benefits of Ruby 1.9 are amazing overall and I was wondering
>> if Puppet, as it stands, is deliberately compatible.
>>
>> I''ve tried digging through the mailing lists and might just be
missing
>> it, if so, I apologize for the oversight.
>
> josb has provided a 1.9 compatibility patch, but we stupidly have not
> merged it in yet.
>
> It''ll be in 0.25, though.
>
> --
> Be wary of the man who urges an action in which he himself incurs no
> risk. -- Joaquin Setanti
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

maybe in the spirit of things, did anyone tried on jruby? on the
puppetmaster?

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Trevor Vaughan
<peiriannydd@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> Awesome. Thanks Luke.
>
> Can''t wait to see how the performance stacks up.
>
> Trevor
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 22:43, Luke Kanies <luke@madstop.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 12, 2009, at 4:43 AM, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> The speed benefits of Ruby 1.9 are amazing overall and I was
wondering
> >> if Puppet, as it stands, is deliberately compatible.
> >>
> >> I''ve tried digging through the mailing lists and might
just be missing
> >> it, if so, I apologize for the oversight.
> >
> > josb has provided a 1.9 compatibility patch, but we stupidly have not
> > merged it in yet.
> >
> > It''ll be in 0.25, though.
> >
> > --
> > Be wary of the man who urges an action in which he himself incurs no
> > risk. -- Joaquin Setanti
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com
> >
> >
> > >
> >
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 20:57 +0800, Ohad Levy wrote:
> maybe in the spirit of things, did anyone tried on jruby? on the
> puppetmaster?
Yes I did.
And all I got was:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-3349

But YMMV, it was on mac osx. I didn''t try any other platform yet. 

I asked on IRC, and it seems someone was working on this issue despite
the bug entry not beeing assigned, and I don''t have any news (good or
bad). If I have time, I''ll ping them once again and try some other
platform (that might be only on the mac osx side of the thing).

I expect jruby to be faster than pure ruby 1.8 (don''t know with 1.9)
because the Java garbage collector is much more powerful.

If you get anything, I''d be interested in your findings,
Thanks,
-- 
Brice Figureau
My Blog: http://www.masterzen.fr/


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> The speed benefits of Ruby 1.9 are amazing overall and I was wondering
> if Puppet, as it stands, is deliberately compatible.
> 
> I''ve tried digging through the mailing lists and might just be
missing
> it, if so, I apologize for the oversight.
> 
Anyone running both puppet and either Fedora 10 or 11 (euh, alpha, 
rawhide, whathaveyou), please let me know.

I maintain or co-maintain both ruby and puppet in Fedora and Extra 
Packages for Enterprise Linux (or EPEL) and I''m interested in testers, 
before I break the Fedora 11 ruby stack.

Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> The speed benefits of Ruby 1.9 are amazing overall and I was wondering
> if Puppet, as it stands, is deliberately compatible.
> 
> I''ve tried digging through the mailing lists and might just be
missing
> it, if so, I apologize for the oversight.
> 
Anyone running both puppet and either Fedora 10 or 11 (euh, alpha,
rawhide, whathaveyou), please let me know.

I maintain or co-maintain both ruby and puppet in Fedora and Extra
Packages for Enterprise Linux (or EPEL) and I''m interested in testers,
before I break the Fedora 11 ruby stack.

Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

I tried to use Puppet and Facter (master version) with Ruby 1.9.1 on
CentOS 5.2 and I succeed to make Facter work but I still have some
errors :

# facter
Could not retrieve ipaddress_eth0: undefined method `each'' for
#<String:0xa08ed8c>
Could not retrieve macaddress_eth0: undefined method `each'' for
#<String:0xa08e724>
Could not retrieve netmask_eth0: undefined method `each'' for
#<String:
0xa08e0d0>
Could not retrieve ipaddress_eth1: undefined method `each'' for
#<String:0xa08da7c>
Could not retrieve macaddress_eth1: undefined method `each'' for
#<String:0xa08d428>
Could not retrieve netmask_eth1: undefined method `each'' for
#<String:
0xa08cdd4>
Could not retrieve ipaddress_sit0: undefined method `each'' for
#<String:0xa2ea9c8>
Could not retrieve macaddress_sit0: undefined method `each'' for
#<String:0xa2ea374>
Could not retrieve netmask_sit0: undefined method `each'' for
#<String:
0xa2e9d20>
Could not retrieve network_eth0: undefined method `each'' for
#<String:
0xa5a274c>
Could not retrieve network_eth1: undefined method `each'' for
#<String:
0xa5a1fb8>
Could not retrieve network_sit0: undefined method `each'' for
#<String:
0xa5a1824>
Could not retrieve macaddress: undefined method `each'' for #<String:
0xa54acb8>
Could not retrieve virtual: undefined method `each'' for #<String:
0xa55a6a4>
Could not retrieve virtual: undefined method `each'' for #<String:
0xa559e98>
architecture => i386
... and then it goes ok.

but puppetmasterd doesn''t work and the errors are :

# puppetmasterd
Could not autoload file: constant Puppet::Type::File not defined
Could not autoload file: constant Puppet::Type::File not defined
...
Could not autoload file: constant Puppet::Type::File not defined
Could not autoload file: constant Puppet::Type::File not defined
Invalid method to apply

I''d be interested in your findings too.
Thanks,

Stéphan Gorget

On Feb 18, 7:18 am, "Jeroen van Meeuwen (GMail)"
<kana...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> > The speed benefits of Ruby 1.9 are amazing overall and I was wondering
> > if Puppet, as it stands, is deliberately compatible.
>
> > I''ve tried digging through the mailing lists and might just
be missing
> > it, if so, I apologize for the oversight.
>
> Anyone running both puppet and either Fedora 10 or 11 (euh, alpha,
> rawhide, whathaveyou), please let me know.
>
> I maintain or co-maintain both ruby and puppet in Fedora and Extra
> Packages for Enterprise Linux (or EPEL) and I''m interested in
testers,
> before I break the Fedora 11 ruby stack.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jeroen van Meeuwen
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

> josb has provided a 1.9 compatibility patch, but we stupidly have not
> merged it in yet.
>
> It''ll be in 0.25, though.
Where can we find this patch?

Or alternatively is 0.25 coming out fairly soon?

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---