Puppet users - Aug 2008 - Creating a define that can accept appended arrays.

Is there a way to create a define that accepts appending arrays?

I.e.:
  define foo ( $bar ) {  baz => $bar }

then
  foo { "one":  baz +> "hello" }
  foo { "two": baz +> "world" }

T

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

On Aug 8, 2008, at 10:28 AM, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> Is there a way to create a define that accepts appending arrays?
>
> I.e.:
>  define foo ( $bar ) {  baz => $bar }
>
> then
>  foo { "one":  baz +> "hello" }
>  foo { "two": baz +> "world" }

This should just work -- Puppet doesn''t syntactically differentiate  
between builtin and defined resource types.

-- 
SCSI is *not* magic. There are fundamental technical reasons
why it is necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain
now and then.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---