-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all There is some discussion of doing a 0.23.3 release to backport a number of bugs fixes from 0.24.0. What do people think of this idea? Would you prefer a dot upgrade to 0.23.3 or are most planning to upgrade cleanly to 0.24.x? I understand from Luke that 0.24.1 will be released shortly and that 0.23.2 clients should cleanly connect and interoperate with a 0.24.1 master. This may make this discussion moot for many people so before I invest a lot of time I''d welcome some feedback. Regards James Turnbull - -- Author of: - - Pulling Strings with Puppet (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590599780/) - - Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590596099/) - - Hardening Linux (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590594444/) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD4DBQFHaRcC9hTGvAxC30ARApHPAKCb5xlmIAZ2ARbQZrbgzzHEZvS+/wCXY6jM SrOynwWEi97cDeWDWmkrGw==TArm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Dec 19, 2007, at 7:05 AM, James Turnbull wrote:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all > > There is some discussion of doing a 0.23.3 release to backport a > number > of bugs fixes from 0.24.0. > > What do people think of this idea? Would you prefer a dot upgrade to > 0.23.3 or are most planning to upgrade cleanly to 0.24.x? > > I understand from Luke that 0.24.1 will be released shortly and that > 0.23.2 clients should cleanly connect and interoperate with a 0.24.1 > master. This may make this discussion moot for many people so > before I > invest a lot of time I''d welcome some feedback.Another consideration I forgot about for 0.23.3: Patching the SSL problems. This is probably the other big fix that 0.23 users would like. -- I never think of the future. It comes soon enough. --Albert Einstein --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com