This is a new one for me. What does it mean? I don''t recall these configs giving me this problem before: RPMs must specify a package source in file /var/lib/puppet/manifests/modules/ssh.pp at line 18
On Dec 5, 2006, at 2:18 AM, Digant C Kasundra wrote:> This is a new one for me. What does it mean? I don''t recall these > configs > giving me this problem before: > > RPMs must specify a package source in file > /var/lib/puppet/manifests/modules/ssh.pp at line 18RPM does not know how to download files (for that, you need yum or up2date), so you have to tell the provider where to find the actual package file. It''s always been like this. -- Today at work an ethernet switch decided to take the ''N'' out of NVRAM -- Richard Letts --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 14:54 -0500, Luke Kanies wrote:> On Dec 5, 2006, at 2:18 AM, Digant C Kasundra wrote: > > > This is a new one for me. What does it mean? I don''t recall these > > configs > > giving me this problem before: > > > > RPMs must specify a package source in file > > /var/lib/puppet/manifests/modules/ssh.pp at line 18 > > RPM does not know how to download files (for that, you need yum or > up2date), so you have to tell the provider where to find the actual > package file.To be clear: rpm will download from http and ftp, but it has to be told explicitly, there''s no notion of a repository or similar. David
--On June 5, 2007 2:54:08 PM -0500 Luke Kanies <luke@madstop.com> wrote:> On Dec 5, 2006, at 2:18 AM, Digant C Kasundra wrote: > >> This is a new one for me. What does it mean? I don''t recall these >> configs >> giving me this problem before: >> >> RPMs must specify a package source in file >> /var/lib/puppet/manifests/modules/ssh.pp at line 18 > > RPM does not know how to download files (for that, you need yum or > up2date), so you have to tell the provider where to find the actual > package file. > > It''s always been like this. >This is why I should check this list more often. That message was meant for an internal mailing list, basically asking what someone had done to jack with the manifests. :)