Elliott Mitchell
2020-Dec-01 02:58 UTC
[Pkg-xen-devel] [PATCH 0/9] RESEND: Fixing cross-compilation, some script work
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 09:46:17PM +0100, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:> On 11/27/20 1:43 AM, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > > 17d192e0238d6c714e9f04593b59597b7090be38 > "tools/python: Pass linker to Python build process" > > This one does not apply cleanly, but that's because of our make file > patches. It's ok, since we would run into the same thing when moving to > 4.15 anyway. > > You might want to triple check what I have done here... After a few > minutes, it's too easy to keep staring at it and not see some small mistake.Almost. The modification of tools/pygrub/Makefile didn't split the line on the build target. My reasoning was it had already grown beyond 80 columns and had not been line-wrapped, so I left it as-is (likely someone will line-wrap in the future). -- (\___(\___(\______ --=> 8-) EHM <=-- ______/)___/)___/) \BS ( | ehem+sigmsg at m5p.com PGP 87145445 | ) / \_CS\ | _____ -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O- _____ | / _/ 8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445
Hans van Kranenburg
2020-Dec-02 00:52 UTC
[Pkg-xen-devel] [PATCH 0/9] RESEND: Fixing cross-compilation, some script work
Hi, On 12/1/20 3:58 AM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 09:46:17PM +0100, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: >> On 11/27/20 1:43 AM, Elliott Mitchell wrote: >>> 17d192e0238d6c714e9f04593b59597b7090be38 >> "tools/python: Pass linker to Python build process" >> >> This one does not apply cleanly, but that's because of our make file >> patches. It's ok, since we would run into the same thing when moving to >> 4.15 anyway. >> >> You might want to triple check what I have done here... After a few >> minutes, it's too easy to keep staring at it and not see some small mistake. > > Almost.Almost what?> The modification of tools/pygrub/Makefile didn't split the line > on the build target. My reasoning was it had already grown beyond 80 > columns and had not been line-wrapped, so I left it as-is (likely someone > will line-wrap in the future).Yes, you're adding new information and telling new thoughts, but all of this does still not tell me if you spotted a mistake in my cherry-pick fix. If you think there is one, point it out. Hans