Ian Jackson
2020-Sep-17 16:21 UTC
[Pkg-xen-devel] [PATCH 12/12] Partially revert "Cross-compilation fixes."
Elliott Mitchell writes ("[PATCH 12/12] Partially revert "Cross-compilation fixes.""):> This partially reverts commit 16504669c5cbb8b195d20412aadc838da5c428f7.Wow, that is an upsteam commit from 2005. However, I would like some kind of explanation. Is it in fact now false that | # These don't cross-compile ? Should this patch go upstream ? Ian. -- Ian Jackson <ijackson at chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Hans van Kranenburg
2020-Sep-17 16:23 UTC
[Pkg-xen-devel] [PATCH 12/12] Partially revert "Cross-compilation fixes."
On 9/17/20 6:21 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:> Elliott Mitchell writes ("[PATCH 12/12] Partially revert "Cross-compilation fixes.""): >> This partially reverts commit 16504669c5cbb8b195d20412aadc838da5c428f7. > > Wow, that is an upsteam commit from 2005. > > However, I would like some kind of explanation. Is it in fact now > false that > | # These don't cross-compile > ? > > Should this patch go upstream ?Yes, that has been done. It's 69953e28563 Hans
Hans van Kranenburg
2020-Sep-17 19:00 UTC
[Pkg-xen-devel] [PATCH 12/12] Partially revert "Cross-compilation fixes."
On 9/17/20 6:23 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:> On 9/17/20 6:21 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: >> Elliott Mitchell writes ("[PATCH 12/12] Partially revert "Cross-compilation fixes.""): >>> This partially reverts commit 16504669c5cbb8b195d20412aadc838da5c428f7. >> >> Wow, that is an upsteam commit from 2005. >> >> However, I would like some kind of explanation. Is it in fact now >> false that >> | # These don't cross-compile >> ? >> >> Should this patch go upstream ? > > Yes, that has been done. > > It's 69953e28563Picked into knorrie/4.14 now, already, so we can't forget it later. K
Elliott Mitchell
2020-Sep-18 06:44 UTC
[Pkg-xen-devel] [PATCH 12/12] Partially revert "Cross-compilation fixes."
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 05:21:32PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:> Elliott Mitchell writes ("[PATCH 12/12] Partially revert "Cross-compilation fixes.""): > > This partially reverts commit 16504669c5cbb8b195d20412aadc838da5c428f7. > > Wow, that is an upsteam commit from 2005. > > However, I would like some kind of explanation. Is it in fact now > false that > | # These don't cross-compile > ?I had the Python portion cross-compiling reliably and so passed it upstream. More recently I was testing Han's 4.14 branch and discovered a bit of breakage which hadn't previously shown up. The patch for that is "tools/python: Pass linker to Python build process" which should already be in your @xenproject.org mailbox... So far it has been almost a week and there hasn't been any commentary. -- (\___(\___(\______ --=> 8-) EHM <=-- ______/)___/)___/) \BS ( | ehem+sigmsg at m5p.com PGP 87145445 | ) / \_CS\ | _____ -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O- _____ | / _/ 8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445