Pkg xen devel - Nov 2016 - Bug#827061: Processed (with 1 error): block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298 828277

Hi Ian,

On 11:16 Tue 15 Nov     , Ian Jackson wrote:
> Debian Bug Tracking System writes ("Processed (with 1 error): block
827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298
828277"):
> > Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> > 
> > > block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513
812166 828412 828298 828277
> > Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
> ...
> > Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 812166, 828586, 828277, 828367,
828298, 828253, 828309, 828412, 828513, and 828307
> 
> 812166 is nothing to do with openssl AFAICT.
> I don't think Xen is involved with the openssl transition.
> 
> Did you get the wrong bug ?
I'm terribly sorry for this mess. I re-added the block that was 
accidentally removed after cloning(!) #828286, and it appears that 
#812166 was previously a blocker[1].

On a side note, I have no idea why the BTS removed all blocking bugs on 
#827061 after cloning just one of them, and it turns out it did so on 
two occasions, my clone[2] and Adrian's one[3].

Regards,
Apollon

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827061;mbox=yes;msg=877 
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827061;mbox=yes;msg=1032
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827061;mbox=yes;msg=921

On 2016-11-15 12:39:25 [+0100], Apollon Oikonomopoulos
wrote:
> Hi Ian,
Hi,
> On 11:16 Tue 15 Nov     , Ian Jackson wrote:
> > 812166 is nothing to do with openssl AFAICT.
> > I don't think Xen is involved with the openssl transition.
> > 
> > Did you get the wrong bug ?
> 
> I'm terribly sorry for this mess. I re-added the block that was 
> accidentally removed after cloning(!) #828286, and it appears that 
> #812166 was previously a blocker[1].
Xen (#812166) is (was) listed as a blocker because it depends on
`openssl' and according to the bug it can't be build. It could be
possible that Xen fails to build due to incompatible changes in the
openssl binary. The rebuild also included the linux package which passed
(so it is possible that Xen passes, too).
> On a side note, I have no idea why the BTS removed all blocking bugs on 
> #827061 after cloning just one of them, and it turns out it did so on 
> two occasions, my clone[2] and Adrian's one[3].
The blocker are removed due to #820044.
> Regards,
> Apollon
Sebastian

Control: fixed 812166 4.8.0~rc3-0exp1
Control: fixed 812166 4.8.0~rc5-1
Control: unblock 827061 by 812166
Control: clone 812166 -2
Control: retitle -2 consider dropping libssl-dev build-dep
Control: severity -2 normal

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes ("Re: Bug#827061: Processed (with 1
error): block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166
828412 828298 828277"):
> Xen (#812166) is (was) listed as a blocker because it depends on
> `openssl' and according to the bug it can't be build. It could be
> possible that Xen fails to build due to incompatible changes in the
> openssl binary. The rebuild also included the linux package which passed
> (so it is possible that Xen passes, too).
Thanks for looking at this.  What you say make sense.

I see that Xen does indeed Build-Depend on libssl-dev.  However, none
of the binary packages Depend on anything containing `ssl'.  I think
the libssl check in configure.ac and the corresponding libssl-dev
build-dep is cruft.  I'm investigating.

So in fact I think, despite appearances, neither src:xen nor any of
the binaries it generates is entangled with openssl.

Anyway, #812166 was fixed upstream in 4.7.0 anyway, so is fixed in
sid/stretch.  I'm closing that bug with this message.

Thanks,
Ian.

Processing control commands:
> fixed 812166 4.8.0~rc3-0exp1
Bug #812166 [xen] xen: FTBFS with GCC 6: statement is indented as if...
There is no source info for the package 'xen' at version
'4.8.0~rc3-0exp1' with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '4.8.0~rc3-0exp1'
Marked as fixed in versions 4.8.0~rc3-0exp1.
> fixed 812166 4.8.0~rc5-1
Bug #812166 [xen] xen: FTBFS with GCC 6: statement is indented as if...
There is no source info for the package 'xen' at version
'4.8.0~rc5-1' with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '4.8.0~rc5-1'
Marked as fixed in versions 4.8.0~rc5-1.
> unblock 827061 by 812166
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 844311 828546 828381 836419 828344 828284 828379 828230
828268 828261 828255 828342 828410 828411 828375 828392 828462 828463 828554
828620 828351 828260 828450 828561 828332 828292 835796 828448 828534 828386
828249 828252 828328 828406 828229 828497 828388 828291 828282 828479 828550
828562 828603 828295 828522 828380 828458 828578 828259 828530 828242 828466
828276 828262 828606 828283 828609 828246 828346 828495 828315 828540 828323
828305 828365 828619 828314 828501 828515 828524 828583 828391 828436 828373
828435 828407 828615 828368 828519 828264 828290 827076 828409 828398 828434
835789 828489 828253 822380 828316 828423 828443 828544 828335 828293 828447
828333 828383 828362 828321 828424 828139 828476 835585 828533 828082 828528
843988 828560 828248 828613 828258 828270 828488 828531 828232 828256 828327
828287 828617 828360 829452 828250 828608 828589 828454 828535 814600 835793
828543 843532 828427 828341 828274 828514 828428 828551 828231 828558 828356
828271 828467 828574 828304 828340 828494 828334 828569 835811 828571 828289
828616 828485 828610 828275 828529 828604 828309 828566 828397 828573 828596
828318 828404 828612 828402 828374 828542 828453 844301 828272 828382 828338
828509 828513 828588 828083 828417 828502 828449 828228 827068 835794 828347
828526 828395 828575 828586 828326 828331 828336 828548 828355 828437 828469
828523 828297 828590 828555 828235 828459 828599 844345 828294 828313 828243
812166 828277 828286 828496 828593 828584 828591 828433 828470 828452 828579
828520 837960 829465 828512 828418 828308 844271 828582 828517 828611 828503
835790 828464 828127 828461 828401 828518 828539 828577 828570 828525 828500
828457 828412 828266 828296 828285 828510 844254 828329 828257 828389 828237
828367 828372 828399 828516 828254 828265 828572 828432 828288 828393 828618
828506 828460 828477 828484 828441 828349 828394 828317 828325 828352 828422
828267 828541 828429 828474 828483 828343 828532 828567 828413 828559 835799
828576 828405 828547 828521 828361 828306 828552 828480 828451 828348 828279
828538 828350 828556 828602 828387 844347 828370 828301 828499 808669 828298
828403 828312 828592 835549 828363 828508 828240 828537 828594 828527 828364
828421 835785 835786 828511 828498 828440 828269 828598 828244 828303 828390
828238 828545 828324 828430 828307 828354 828414 828585 828600 828482 828241
828400 828587 828281 828444 828376 828280 809271 828487 828251 828439 828445
828300 828359 828302 828358 828371 828504 828263 828234 828369 828581 828549
828319 828564 828601 828597 828568 828492 828505 828481 828536 828456 828493
828607 828595 828465 828310 828431 828553 828605 828473 828472 828330 828245
828614 835797 828419 828320 835800 828468 828239 828337 828357 828396 828425
828557 828353 828311 828507 828415 828385 828233 828416 835798 828366 828580
828486 828565 828142 828491 828446 828478 828438 828471 835804 828377 828563
828490 828278 828426 828339 828384 841635 828322 828442 828455 828420 828378
828345 828273
827061 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 812166
> clone 812166 -2
Bug #812166 [xen] xen: FTBFS with GCC 6: statement is indented as if...
Bug 812166 cloned as bug 844417
> retitle -2 consider dropping libssl-dev build-dep
Bug #844417 [xen] xen: FTBFS with GCC 6: statement is indented as if...
Changed Bug title to 'consider dropping libssl-dev build-dep' from
'xen: FTBFS with GCC 6: statement is indented as
if...'.
> severity -2 normal
Bug #844417 [xen] consider dropping libssl-dev build-dep
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'

-- 
812166: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812166
827061: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827061
844417: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844417
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems

On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> Hi Ian,
> 
> On 11:16 Tue 15 Nov     , Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Debian Bug Tracking System writes ("Processed (with 1 error):
block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298
828277"):
> > > Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> > > 
> > > > block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513
812166 828412 828298 828277
> > > Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
> > ...
> > > Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 812166, 828586, 828277, 828367,
828298, 828253, 828309, 828412, 828513, and 828307
> > 
> > 812166 is nothing to do with openssl AFAICT.
> > I don't think Xen is involved with the openssl transition.
> > 
> > Did you get the wrong bug ?
> 
> I'm terribly sorry for this mess. I re-added the block that was 
> accidentally removed after cloning(!) #828286, and it appears that 
> #812166 was previously a blocker[1].
> 
> On a side note, I have no idea why the BTS removed all blocking bugs on 
> #827061 after cloning just one of them, and it turns out it did so on 
> two occasions, my clone[2] and Adrian's one[3].
Hrm; that's not supposed to happen.

Let me check that out and see if I can fix it.

-- 
Don Armstrong                      https://www.donarmstrong.com

Information wants to be free to kill again.
 -- Red Robot http://www.dieselsweeties.com/archive.php?s=1372