On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 12:03:29PM +0100, Guido Trotter
wrote:> One of the first changes we might want to do is move away
> /etc/sysconfig/xendomains... We should put it either in
/etc/default/xendomains
> (since it's an init script configuration) or /etc/xen/xendomains (since
it's xen
> related)... Which one do you prefer?
/etc/default
> As for the way to do it I propose a dpatch file that changes the two files
in
> the upstream tarball that actually nominate the path... It's easy and
it works,
> but sure can be done in other ways, anything you would prefer?
No.
> Then we can go ahead splitting hypervisor and userspace... Preferences for
the
> naming? Shall we keep the hypervisor as "xen" and call the rest
"xen-userspace"?
> or "xen-hypervisor" and "xen-userspace" and have xen be
a metapackage depending
> on both, for the sake of compatibility with the past?
xen-userspace is a bad name I think.
xen-manager or something like that (xen-tools is even better.. grrr).
xen or xen-hypervizo+metapackage, I don't really care.
--
Julien Danjou
.''`. Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid
`- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20060217/985f8a24/attachment.pgp