Hi! Please tell me if you plan to provide debian packages for kipi-plugins 0.2.0 beta3 and koffice 2.0 beta3 in experimental. regards matthias
Ana Guerrero
2008-Nov-23 21:07 UTC
kipi-plugins 0.2.0 beta3 and KOffice 2.0 beta 3 packages
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 09:45:23PM +0100, Matthias wrote:> Hi! > > Please tell me if you plan to provide debian packages for kipi-plugins 0.2.0 > beta3 and koffice 2.0 beta3 in experimental. >koffice 2.0 beta3 is very unlikely to be uploaded to experimental, you have the beta2 and using its packaging beta3 should be straightforward to build. Beta 4 is scheduled for mid-december, and do not worry that one will make experimental together with translations. I do not maintain kipi-plugins, so no idea. Ana
Beojan Stanislaus
2008-Nov-23 22:17 UTC
kipi-plugins 0.2.0 beta3 and KOffice 2.0 beta 3 packages
On Sunday 23 November 2008 21:07:24 Ana Guerrero wrote:> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 09:45:23PM +0100, Matthias wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Please tell me if you plan to provide debian packages for kipi-plugins > > 0.2.0 beta3 and koffice 2.0 beta3 in experimental. > > koffice 2.0 beta3 is very unlikely to be uploaded to experimental, you have > the beta2 and using its packaging beta3 should be straightforward to build. > Beta 4 is scheduled for mid-december, and do not worry that one will make > experimental together with translations. > > I do not maintain kipi-plugins, so no idea. > > AnaCan you tell me whether there is any plan to package the KOffice2 version of Kexi when Koffice2 beta 4 is packaged?
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
2008-Nov-23 23:28 UTC
kipi-plugins 0.2.0 beta3 and KOffice 2.0 beta 3 packages
Sorry Ana, this should have gone to the list On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Lisandro Dami?n Nicanor P?rez Meyer <perezmeyer at gmail.com> wrote:> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Ana Guerrero <ana at debian.org> wrote: > [snip] >> koffice 2.0 beta3 is very unlikely to be uploaded to experimental, you have >> the beta2 and using its packaging beta3 should be straightforward to build. > > Is there anything I can do to reverse this? I mean, perhaps it needs > some test or something like that in order to upload it. Or maybe > there''s another reason not to upload it :-) > > -- > Lisandro Dami?n Nicanor P?rez Meyer > http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ > http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ >-- Lisandro Dami?n Nicanor P?rez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Ana Guerrero
2008-Nov-24 22:39 UTC
kipi-plugins 0.2.0 beta3 and KOffice 2.0 beta 3 packages
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:17:49PM +0000, Beojan Stanislaus wrote:> On Sunday 23 November 2008 21:07:24 Ana Guerrero wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 09:45:23PM +0100, Matthias wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Please tell me if you plan to provide debian packages for kipi-plugins > > > 0.2.0 beta3 and koffice 2.0 beta3 in experimental. > > > > koffice 2.0 beta3 is very unlikely to be uploaded to experimental, you have > > the beta2 and using its packaging beta3 should be straightforward to build. > > Beta 4 is scheduled for mid-december, and do not worry that one will make > > experimental together with translations. > > > > I do not maintain kipi-plugins, so no idea. > > > > Ana > > Can you tell me whether there is any plan to package the KOffice2 version of > Kexi when Koffice2 beta 4 is packaged? >There is not plan to package it, since kexi (Kivio and KFormula) is not being released as part of KOffice 2.0 Ana
Ana Guerrero
2008-Nov-24 22:45 UTC
kipi-plugins 0.2.0 beta3 and KOffice 2.0 beta 3 packages
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 09:28:59PM -0200, Lisandro Dami?n Nicanor P?rez Meyer wrote:> Sorry Ana, this should have gone to the list > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Lisandro Dami?n Nicanor P?rez Meyer > <perezmeyer at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Ana Guerrero <ana at debian.org> wrote: > > [snip] > >> koffice 2.0 beta3 is very unlikely to be uploaded to experimental, you have > >> the beta2 and using its packaging beta3 should be straightforward to build. > > > > Is there anything I can do to reverse this? I mean, perhaps it needs > > some test or something like that in order to upload it. Or maybe > > there''s another reason not to upload it :-) > >IIRC you have commit access, so improve/fix what you think that needs to be done and commit it. The problem is on my side, because I am not going to review, test and so on, you changes and then upload (nothing against you, just I can not do that currently). And I am not sure somebody else will volunteer. But whatever you do will be done for beta4 which i am planning to upload. BTW, beta4 will be released by the 10th of December, i will upload it to Debian, but do not expect it in the repos exaclty that day... Ana