Hi! I have a reproducable crash of Amarok Beta 3, I installed the amarok-dbg package in order to create a backtrace. From the KDE Crash Handler I''m getting the following note: This backtrace appears to be of no use. This is probably because your packages are built in a way which prevents creation of proper backtraces, or the stack frame was seriously corrupted in the crash. Obviously I have gdb installed. I tried to start amarok from within gdb, but I have "only 380 MBytes" of RAM, and this attempt locked the whole system swapping. Because the harddisk is dog slow, swapping doesn''t really make sense, so I terminated this attempt after watching a few minutes. Do you have an idea why the Crash Handler can''t create the backtrace? Or do you have another proposal on how I could get the backtrace? regards matthias
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
2008-Nov-07 17:01 UTC
Question regarding KDE Crash Handler
On Friday 07 November 2008 10:45:18 Matthias wrote:> Hi! > > I have a reproducable crash of Amarok Beta 3, I installed the amarok-dbg > package in order to create a backtrace. From the KDE Crash Handler I''m > getting the following note:Is there a way to reproduce the problem? Nontheless, Amarok is Beta, so crashed are spected. -- La ciencia sin la religi?n es renga, la religi?n sin la ciencia es ciega. Albert Einstein Lisandro Dami?n Nicanor P?rez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-talk/attachments/20081107/8dbb9cf9/attachment.pgp
Hi,> This backtrace appears to be of no use. > This is probably because your packages are built in a way which prevents > creation of proper backtraces, or the stack frame was seriously corrupted > in the crash.Afair Amarok is a "unique application", so only one instance even if you run "amarok" multiple times. Try to close it, then run "amarok --nofork &" and wait for it to crash. -- Pino Toscano -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-talk/attachments/20081107/2bf43ddc/attachment.pgp
Hello, penktadienis 07 Lapkritis 2008, Matthias ra??:> I tried to start amarok from within gdb, but I have "only 380 MBytes" of > RAM, and this attempt locked the whole system swapping. Because the > harddisk is dog slow, swapping doesn''t really make sense, so I terminated > this attempt after watching a few minutes.If it ends up swapping when you run Amarok under gdb directly, backtrace with KDE Crash Handler won''t be any easier. It will need the same amount of RAM if not more to generate a backtrace. I recommend to report the steps how to reproduce the bug to Amarok developers (which you did).> Do you have an idea why the Crash Handler can''t create the backtrace? Or do > you have another proposal on how I could get the backtrace?There may be many reasons. Make sure you installed packages recommended by amarok-dbg. The most reliable way to get the backtrace is: $ gdb --args amarok --nofork (gdb) run <crash amarok> (gdb) bt -- Modestas Vainius <modestas at vainius.eu> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-talk/attachments/20081108/f487ffe0/attachment.pgp