opus - Mar 2011 - Possible bug in CELT's VBR code

Hi guys,

It looks to me like line 955 in celt.c should be:

       effectiveBytes = vbr_rate>>(3+BITRES);

otherwise it seems like "effectiveBytes" is 8 times larger than it 
should be (at least if it's really meant to be bytes).

Cheers,
John Ridges

Hi,

I'm not sure what version you're using (this code no longer exists), but
you should be aware that VBR was pretty broken until version 0.10. If 
you're using something earlier than 0.10, I recommend either upgrading 
or using CBR.

Cheers,

	Jean-Marc

On 11-02-28 07:55 PM, John Ridges wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> It looks to me like line 955 in celt.c should be:
>
>         effectiveBytes = vbr_rate>>(3+BITRES);
>
> otherwise it seems like "effectiveBytes" is 8 times larger than
it
> should be (at least if it's really meant to be bytes).
>
> Cheers,
> John Ridges
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> celt-dev mailing list
> celt-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/celt-dev
>
>