Trying to rebuild openssh-2.9.9p2-1.src.rpm on Red Hat 6.1: Script started on Mon Oct 8 11:26:09 2001 [root at five work]# rpm --rebuild openssh-2.9.9p2-1.src.rpm Installing openssh-2.9.9p2-1.src.rpm Bad owner/group: /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/x11-ssh-askpass-1.2.4.tar.gz [root at five work]# ls -l /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/ total 720 -rw-rw-r-- 1 500 500 697371 Sep 25 15:50 openssh-2.9.9p2.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 500 500 29197 Sep 16 15:15 x11-ssh-askpass-1.2.4.tar.gz [root at five work]# exit exit Script done on Mon Oct 8 11:26:27 2001 -- Florin Andrei "In theory, under the new computer security law, anyone whose computer was infected by Nimda/CodeRed could be imprisoned for life -- the new law says nothing about intent. So, basically we would have a few million Microsoft Windows users serving life sentences..." - Dan Hollis
Circa 2001-Oct-08 12:28:51 -0700 dixit Florin Andrei: : Trying to rebuild openssh-2.9.9p2-1.src.rpm on Red Hat 6.1: : : Script started on Mon Oct 8 11:26:09 2001 : [root at five work]# rpm --rebuild openssh-2.9.9p2-1.src.rpm : Installing openssh-2.9.9p2-1.src.rpm : Bad owner/group: /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/x11-ssh-askpass-1.2.4.tar.gz : [root at five work]# ls -l /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/ : total 720 : -rw-rw-r-- 1 500 500 697371 Sep 25 15:50 openssh-2.9.9p2.tar.gz : -rw-rw-r-- 1 500 500 29197 Sep 16 15:15 x11-ssh-askpass-1.2.4.tar.gz : [root at five work]# exit : exit : Script done on Mon Oct 8 11:26:27 2001 What version of RPM? -- jim knoble | jmknoble at pobox.com | http://www.pobox.com/~jmknoble/ (GnuPG fingerprint: 31C4:8AAC:F24E:A70C:4000::BBF4:289F:EAA8:1381:1491) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20011008/80415e58/attachment.bin
On Mon, 2001-10-08 at 15:38, Jim Knoble wrote:> > What version of RPM?The default one, which is extremely older and fails later during the build anyway. :o) But the point is - why those strange UID/GID? (500/500) -- Florin Andrei "In theory, under the new computer security law, anyone whose computer was infected by Nimda/CodeRed could be imprisoned for life -- the new law says nothing about intent. So, basically we would have a few million Microsoft Windows users serving life sentences..." - Dan Hollis