openssh unix dev - Jul 2000 - openssh-2.1.1p4 (fwd)

Can any HP/UX users comment?

-- 
| "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox
| Damien Miller - http://www.mindrot.org/
| Email: djm at mindrot.org (home) -or- djm at ibs.com.au (work)



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 09:16:23 +0200
From: "[iso-8859-1] SOETE Jo?l" <JSO at EUROPAY.COM>
To: "'openssh at openssh.com'" <openssh at openssh.com>
Subject: openssh-2.1.1p4

Hi all,

I successfully compiled (gcc 2.95.1) on HPUX (11.00 & 10.20) and installed
and configured both openssh client and a server (with openssl-0.9.5a).
A slogin session works fine (with and without ssl authentication).

But a scp causes a problem: as server side scp receive well EOF against
background slogin session (launch normally by client scp itself) loop (end
only with a kill). 

I do not have opportunity to test on another OS, so I do not know if it is
an error in my configuration and no more where to look for.
Any idea?

Joel

This seems to be the "scp not shutting down" problem.  ssh isn't
looping
on the client scp side, it's blocked in select().  See the trace and gdb
output I posted in the other thread.

Kevin

On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Damien Miller wrote:
> Can any HP/UX users comment?
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 09:16:23 +0200
> From: "[iso-8859-1] SOETE Jo?l" <JSO at EUROPAY.COM>
> To: "'openssh at openssh.com'" <openssh at
openssh.com>
> Subject: openssh-2.1.1p4
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I successfully compiled (gcc 2.95.1) on HPUX (11.00 & 10.20) and
installed
> and configured both openssh client and a server (with openssl-0.9.5a).
> A slogin session works fine (with and without ssl authentication).
> 
> But a scp causes a problem: as server side scp receive well EOF against
> background slogin session (launch normally by client scp itself) loop (end
> only with a kill). 
> 
> I do not have opportunity to test on another OS, so I do not know if it is
> an error in my configuration and no more where to look for.
> Any idea?
> 
> Joel