openssh bugs - Jan 2014 - [Bug 2197] New: Add ED25519 support to SSHFP dns record

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2197

            Bug ID: 2197
           Summary: Add ED25519 support to SSHFP dns record
           Product: Portable OpenSSH
           Version: -current
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P5
         Component: ssh
          Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
          Reporter: loganaden at gmail.com

Hi,

Ajay Ramjatan @ tuxlab noticed that ED25519 can't be used for SSHFP DNS
while testing the upcoming 6.5

I've attached a diff.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2197

--- Comment #1 from Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden at gmail.com> ---
Created attachment 2399
  --> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2399&action=edit
ed25519 sshfp dns

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2197

Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |djm at mindrot.org

--- Comment #2 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> ---
No, the SSH_FP_* values are defined in RFC4255 and new ones will
require IETF consensus. This is unlikely to happen for Ed25519 unless
and until a RFC is published for the key format.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2197

--- Comment #3 from Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Damien Miller from comment #2)
> No, the SSH_FP_* values are defined in RFC4255 and new ones will
> require IETF consensus. This is unlikely to happen for Ed25519
> unless and until a RFC is published for the key format.
I'm working on that :-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2197

--- Comment #4 from Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Damien Miller from comment #2)
> No, the SSH_FP_* values are defined in RFC4255 and new ones will
> require IETF consensus. This is unlikely to happen for Ed25519
> unless and until a RFC is published for the key format.
I'm working on that :-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2197

Mantas M. <grawity at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |grawity at gmail.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2197

Simon Deziel <simon at sdeziel.info> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |simon at sdeziel.info

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2197

mancha <mancha1 at zoho.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mancha1 at zoho.com

--- Comment #5 from mancha <mancha1 at zoho.com> ---
*** Bug 2223 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2197

Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
             Blocks|                            |2226
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #6 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> ---
This is committed and will be in openssh-6.7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2197

Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED

--- Comment #7 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> ---
Close all bugs left open from 6.6 and 6.7 releases.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.