bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2008-Mar-19 01:03 UTC
[Bug 1090] Increase MAX_SESSIONS?
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090
Paul Wankadia <junyer at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #979 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
--- Comment #7 from Paul Wankadia <junyer at gmail.com> 2008-03-19
12:03:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=1473)
--> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1473)
adds MaxSessions knob to daemon configuration
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2008-Mar-19 01:08 UTC
[Bug 1090] Increase MAX_SESSIONS?
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090
Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |djm at mindrot.org
--- Comment #8 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> 2008-03-19
12:08:26 ---
Ideally we should permit a "MaxSessions unlimited" that allows
creation
of as many sessions as there are available file descriptors to serve
them. This would require dynamic allocation of the channels list
(perhaps with some protection against fragmentation as channels close),
similar changes to the channels list and an audit of both the session
and channels code to ensure that they fail gracefully when they run out
of file descriptors.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2008-Mar-19 01:40 UTC
[Bug 1090] Increase MAX_SESSIONS?
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090
Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dtucker at zip.com.au
--- Comment #9 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> 2008-03-19
12:40:11 ---
(In reply to comment #8)> Ideally we should permit a "MaxSessions unlimited" that allows
creation
> of as many sessions as there are available file descriptors to serve
> them. This would require dynamic allocation of the channels list
Did you mean session list here? The channel list is already dynamic
(however it uses xrealloc so an allocation failure will kill the
connection).
> (perhaps with some protection against fragmentation as channels close),
> similar changes to the channels list and an audit of both the session
> and channels code to ensure that they fail gracefully when they run out
> of file descriptors.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2008-Mar-19 01:41 UTC
[Bug 1090] Increase MAX_SESSIONS?
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090 --- Comment #10 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> 2008-03-19 12:41:36 --- Yes, s/channels list/sessions list/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2008-Apr-18 13:16 UTC
[Bug 1090] Increase MAX_SESSIONS?
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090
Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Blocks| |1452
--- Comment #11 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> 2008-04-18
23:16:42 ---
Put this on the 5.1 list
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.